ISVBF vs. KTEC
ISVBF (iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF) and KTEC (KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF) are both China Equities funds - ISVBF tracks the MSCI China A Inclusion Index while KTEC tracks the Hang Seng Tech Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ISVBF returned -2.48%/yr vs -6.94%/yr for KTEC. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ISVBF charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for KTEC.
Performance
ISVBF vs. KTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISVBF achieves a -6.75% return, which is significantly higher than KTEC's -12.02% return.
ISVBF
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 9.06%
- 6M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- -6.75%
- 1Y
- -0.99%
- 3Y*
- 8.45%
- 5Y*
- -2.48%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -4.43%
KTEC
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 11.11%
- 6M
- -10.82%
- YTD
- -12.02%
- 1Y
- -13.52%
- 3Y*
- 1.38%
- 5Y*
- -6.94%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -10.24%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $147.49K | $255.95K | $315.23K | |
| $995.11K | $971.85K | $1.05M |
ISVBF vs. KTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISVBF iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF | -6.75% | 30.64% | 18.96% | -9.28% | -23.01% | -24.42% |
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF | -12.02% | 21.01% | 16.13% | -10.41% | -26.12% | -29.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISVBF and KTEC is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2021 | 0.34 |
Over the past year, ISVBF and KTEC have become more correlated (0.66) than their long-term average of 0.34, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISVBF vs. KTEC — Risk / Return Rank
ISVBF
KTEC
ISVBF vs. KTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (ISVBF) and KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISVBF | KTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 0.94 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | -0.37 | +0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.09 | -0.66 | +0.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISVBF vs. KTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISVBF drawdown since its inception was -53.78%, smaller than the maximum KTEC drawdown of -66.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISVBF and KTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISVBF | KTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.78% | -66.90% | +13.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.14% | -36.49% | +12.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.14% | -36.49% | +12.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.06% | -60.08% | +14.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.42% | -44.48% | +20.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.57% | -44.06% | +11.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.23% | 20.61% | -9.38% |
Volatility
ISVBF vs. KTEC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (ISVBF) is 6.46%, while KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) has a volatility of 7.10%. This indicates that ISVBF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISVBF | KTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.46% | 7.10% | -0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.45% | 20.10% | +6.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.60% | 28.13% | +3.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.08% | 42.61% | -12.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.06% | 42.72% | -12.66% |
ISVBF vs. KTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISVBF has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than KTEC's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISVBF vs. KTEC - Dividend Comparison
ISVBF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISVBF iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF | 3.81% | 3.36% | 0.27% | 0.81% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISVBF and KTEC have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KTEC has higher volatility (7.10%) compared to ISVBF (6.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISVBF dropped -53.78% vs KTEC's -66.90%.
On 5-year performance, ISVBF leads with -2.48% vs -6.94% for KTEC. On fees, ISVBF is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, ISVBF has been the lower-risk option at 6.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ISVBF has performed better with a -2.48% return vs -6.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISVBF is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for KTEC.
KTEC has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 0.00% for ISVBF.
ISVBF tracks MSCI China A Inclusion Index, while KTEC tracks Hang Seng Tech Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for ISVBF and 0.69% for KTEC.
ISVBF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.03 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISVBF and KTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer