PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISSC vs. FUN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ISSC vs. FUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. (ISSC) and Cedar Fair, L.P. (FUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISSC achieves a -2.43% return, which is significantly lower than FUN's 52.80% return. Over the past 10 years, ISSC has outperformed FUN with an annualized return of 21.80%, while FUN has yielded a comparatively lower -5.82% annualized return.


ISSC

1D
-4.59%
1M
13.55%
YTD
-2.43%
6M
65.59%
1Y
46.20%
3Y*
38.47%
5Y*
24.62%
10Y*
21.80%

FUN

1D
-3.90%
1M
9.94%
YTD
52.80%
6M
57.21%
1Y
-21.53%
3Y*
-16.99%
5Y*
-11.16%
10Y*
-5.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISSC vs. FUN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISSC
Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc.
-2.43%121.78%0.12%3.77%25.32%0.61%29.83%158.41%-23.13%-11.71%
FUN
Cedar Fair, L.P.
52.80%-68.17%26.39%-0.96%-16.23%27.25%-27.49%25.65%-22.66%6.45%

Correlation

The correlation between ISSC and FUN is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2000

0.10

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ISSC:

$338.23M

FUN:

$2.38B

EPS

ISSC:

$0.94

FUN:

-$16.06

PS Ratio

ISSC:

3.69

FUN:

0.82

PB Ratio

ISSC:

4.69

FUN:

0.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

ISSC:

$90.56M

FUN:

$2.90B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ISSC:

$44.22M

FUN:

$1.59B

EBITDA (TTM)

ISSC:

$26.70M

FUN:

-$733.45M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISSC vs. FUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISSC
ISSC Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
ISSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISSC Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ISSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISSC Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

FUN
FUN Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUN Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUN Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISSC vs. FUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. (ISSC) and Cedar Fair, L.P. (FUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ISSCFUNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.98

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

-0.43

+1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.59

-0.66

+2.25

ISSC vs. FUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISSC Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is higher than the FUN Sharpe Ratio of -0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISSC and FUN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ISSC vs. FUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISSC drawdown since its inception was -89.03%, which is greater than FUN's maximum drawdown of -77.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISSC and FUN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISSCFUNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.03%

-77.75%

-11.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.83%

-61.05%

+3.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.83%

-77.74%

+19.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.83%

-77.74%

+19.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.41%

-77.75%

+15.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.53%

-59.33%

+19.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.58%

-19.87%

-30.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.63%

39.79%

-8.16%

Volatility

ISSC vs. FUN - Volatility Comparison

Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. (ISSC) has a higher volatility of 25.92% compared to Cedar Fair, L.P. (FUN) at 15.26%. This indicates that ISSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISSCFUNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.92%

15.26%

+10.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

65.82%

44.94%

+20.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

83.28%

66.85%

+16.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.11%

44.02%

+15.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.12%

45.15%

+11.97%

Dividends

ISSC vs. FUN - Dividend Comparison

Neither ISSC nor FUN has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUN
Cedar Fair, L.P.
0.00%0.00%4.42%3.02%1.45%0.00%2.38%6.69%7.60%5.32%5.19%5.51%
ISSC
Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.00%17.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ISSC vs. FUN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. and Cedar Fair, L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20222023202420252026
22.37M
0
(ISSC) Total Revenue
(FUN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ISSC and FUN have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ISSC has higher volatility (25.92%) compared to FUN (15.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISSC dropped -89.03% vs FUN's -77.75%.

ISSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISSC and FUN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer