ISRA vs. PJBF
ISRA (VanEck Israel ETF) and PJBF (PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF) are both Global Equities funds. ISRA is passively managed, while PJBF is actively managed. Both charge a 0.59% expense ratio.
Performance
ISRA vs. PJBF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ISRA
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 5.07%
- YTD
- 12.29%
- 1Y
- 30.85%
- 3Y*
- 23.27%
- 5Y*
- 9.27%
- 10Y*
- 10.52%
PJBF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISRA vs. PJBF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ISRA VanEck Israel ETF | 3.43% |
PJBF PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF | 0.00% |
ISRA vs. PJBF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ISRA
PJBF
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
ISRA
PJBF
Technology
ISRA
PJBF
Healthcare
ISRA
PJBF
Industrials
ISRA
PJBF
Utilities
ISRA
PJBF
Real Estate
ISRA
PJBF
-
Energy
ISRA
PJBF
-
Consumer Cyclical
ISRA
PJBF
Communication Services
ISRA
PJBF
Consumer Defensive
ISRA
PJBF
Basic Materials
ISRA
PJBF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISRA vs. PJBF — Risk / Return Rank
ISRA
PJBF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ISRA vs. PJBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) and PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISRA | PJBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.94 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISRA vs. PJBF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISRA drawdown since its inception was -45.02%, which is greater than PJBF's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISRA and PJBF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISRA | PJBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.02% | 0.00% | -45.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.20% | 0.00% | -6.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.16% | 0.00% | -11.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.90% | — | — |
Volatility
ISRA vs. PJBF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISRA | PJBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.05% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.56% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.19% | 0.00% | +21.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.18% | 0.00% | +22.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.02% | 0.00% | +21.02% |
ISRA vs. PJBF - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ISRA and PJBF have an expense ratio of 0.59%.
Dividends
ISRA vs. PJBF - Dividend Comparison
ISRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, while PJBF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISRA VanEck Israel ETF | 1.32% | 1.48% | 1.21% | 1.89% | 1.36% | 1.28% | 0.17% | 1.38% | 0.76% | 1.58% | 1.62% | 1.31% |
PJBF PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISRA and PJBF have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.
ISRA has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.00% for PJBF.
They also come from different issuers: VanEck and PGIM.
Find the right allocation for ISRA and PJBF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer