ISRA vs. GSWO
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Israel ETF (ISRA) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF (GSWO).
ISRA and GSWO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ISRA is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the BlueStar Israel Global Index. It was launched on Jun 25, 2013. GSWO is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Low Vol Plus Equity Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Mar 15, 2022. Both ISRA and GSWO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ISRA vs. GSWO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ISRA vs. GSWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISRA VanEck Vectors Israel ETF | 2.82% | 36.98% | 26.03% | -0.08% | -19.48% |
GSWO Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF | -2.17% | 18.97% | 15.29% | 16.28% | -6.15% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISRA achieves a 2.82% return, which is significantly higher than GSWO's -2.17% return.
ISRA
- 1D
- 4.70%
- 1M
- -1.45%
- YTD
- 2.82%
- 6M
- 12.36%
- 1Y
- 45.42%
- 3Y*
- 20.81%
- 5Y*
- 7.67%
- 10Y*
- 9.48%
GSWO
- 1D
- 2.87%
- 1M
- -5.76%
- YTD
- -2.17%
- 6M
- -0.46%
- 1Y
- 11.32%
- 3Y*
- 14.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ISRA vs. GSWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISRA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than GSWO's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ISRA vs. GSWO — Risk / Return Rank
ISRA
GSWO
ISRA vs. GSWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Israel ETF (ISRA) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF (GSWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISRA | GSWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.95 | 0.84 | +1.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.73 | 1.24 | +1.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.18 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.07 | 1.24 | +2.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.07 | 5.62 | +9.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISRA | GSWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 0.84 | +1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.77 | -0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between ISRA and GSWO is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ISRA vs. GSWO - Dividend Comparison
ISRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than GSWO's 1.83% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISRA VanEck Vectors Israel ETF | 1.44% | 1.48% | 1.21% | 1.89% | 1.36% | 1.28% | 0.17% | 1.38% | 0.76% | 1.58% | 1.62% | 1.31% |
GSWO Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF | 1.83% | 1.74% | 1.75% | 2.06% | 1.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ISRA vs. GSWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISRA drawdown since its inception was -45.02%, which is greater than GSWO's maximum drawdown of -17.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISRA and GSWO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISRA | GSWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.02% | -17.77% | -27.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.02% | -9.50% | -1.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.83% | -6.31% | -0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.32% | -3.35% | -7.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 2.10% | +0.87% |
Volatility
ISRA vs. GSWO - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Israel ETF (ISRA) has a higher volatility of 8.99% compared to Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF (GSWO) at 5.76%. This indicates that ISRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ISRA | GSWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.99% | 5.76% | +3.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.48% | 8.20% | +7.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.44% | 13.60% | +9.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.86% | 12.98% | +8.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.87% | 12.98% | +7.89% |