PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISRA vs. FYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISRA vs. FYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) and Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISRA achieves a 13.95% return, which is significantly lower than FYLD's 22.11% return. Over the past 10 years, ISRA has underperformed FYLD with an annualized return of 10.54%, while FYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 11.61% annualized return.


ISRA

1D
2.91%
1M
2.76%
6M
5.19%
YTD
13.95%
1Y
35.15%
3Y*
25.31%
5Y*
8.79%
10Y*
10.54%
ALL TIME*
9.07%

FYLD

1D
0.26%
1M
6.12%
6M
10.60%
YTD
22.11%
1Y
35.96%
3Y*
21.97%
5Y*
12.71%
10Y*
11.61%
ALL TIME*
8.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.65M$1.78M$3.02M
$185.25K$264.84K$402.02K

ISRA vs. FYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISRA
VanEck Israel ETF
13.95%36.98%26.03%-0.08%-25.76%10.06%28.21%26.77%-7.04%15.07%
FYLD
Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF
22.11%34.53%3.00%13.18%-5.53%18.67%4.17%17.83%-14.47%29.81%

Correlation

The correlation between ISRA and FYLD is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2013

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between ISRA and FYLD has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ISRA vs. FYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISRA
FYLD

Technology

34.8%
2.7%

Financial Services

27.9%
22.2%

Industrials

8.4%
13.7%

Healthcare

7.8%

-

Basic Materials

5.4%
7.6%

Real Estate

5.3%

-

Utilities

5.3%
3.9%

Energy

3.3%
25.1%

Consumer Cyclical

2.6%
11.4%

Communication Services

1.7%
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

1.7%
7.5%

Technology

ISRA
34.8%
FYLD
2.7%

Financial Services

ISRA
27.9%
FYLD
22.2%

Industrials

ISRA
8.4%
FYLD
13.7%

Healthcare

ISRA
7.8%
FYLD

-

Basic Materials

ISRA
5.4%
FYLD
7.6%

Real Estate

ISRA
5.3%
FYLD

-

Utilities

ISRA
5.3%
FYLD
3.9%

Energy

ISRA
3.3%
FYLD
25.1%

Consumer Cyclical

ISRA
2.6%
FYLD
11.4%

Communication Services

ISRA
1.7%
FYLD
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

ISRA
1.7%
FYLD
7.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISRA vs. FYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ISRA
ISRA Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
ISRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISRA Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
ISRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISRA Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

FYLD
FYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ISRA vs. FYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) and Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ISRAFYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.53

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

6.37

-3.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.55

19.40

-10.85

ISRA vs. FYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISRA Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is lower than the FYLD Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISRA and FYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ISRA vs. FYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISRA drawdown since its inception was -45.02%, roughly equal to the maximum FYLD drawdown of -44.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISRA and FYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISRAFYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.02%

-44.55%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.99%

-5.67%

-6.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.67%

-15.15%

-7.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.02%

-25.12%

-19.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.02%

-44.55%

-0.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.82%

-0.41%

-4.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.15%

-8.74%

-2.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.14%

1.86%

+2.28%

Volatility

ISRA vs. FYLD - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) has a higher volatility of 6.88% compared to Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) at 2.92%. This indicates that ISRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISRAFYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.88%

2.92%

+3.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.13%

9.37%

+7.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.53%

12.08%

+9.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.26%

16.16%

+6.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.09%

17.75%

+3.34%

ISRA vs. FYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ISRA and FYLD have an expense ratio of 0.59%.


Dividends

ISRA vs. FYLD - Dividend Comparison

ISRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than FYLD's 3.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FYLD
Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF
3.30%4.07%5.41%6.06%6.13%4.74%3.94%3.73%5.17%2.85%2.72%3.98%
ISRA
VanEck Israel ETF
1.30%1.48%1.21%1.89%1.36%1.28%0.17%1.38%0.76%1.58%1.62%1.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISRA and FYLD have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ISRA has higher volatility (6.88%) compared to FYLD (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISRA dropped -45.02% vs FYLD's -44.55%.

On 10-year performance, FYLD leads with 11.61% vs 10.54% for ISRA. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, FYLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FYLD has performed better with a 11.61% return vs 10.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISRA and FYLD have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.

FYLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.30%, compared with 1.30% for ISRA.

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Cambria.

FYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISRA and FYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer