ISRA vs. FYLD
ISRA (VanEck Israel ETF) and FYLD (Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF) are both Global Equities funds. ISRA is passively managed, while FYLD is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, ISRA returned 10.83%/yr vs 11.35%/yr for FYLD. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.59% expense ratio.
Performance
ISRA vs. FYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISRA achieves a 14.05% return, which is significantly lower than FYLD's 18.51% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ISRA having a 10.83% annualized return and FYLD not far ahead at 11.35%.
ISRA
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- -1.80%
- YTD
- 14.05%
- 6M
- 17.88%
- 1Y
- 41.95%
- 3Y*
- 26.30%
- 5Y*
- 9.13%
- 10Y*
- 10.83%
FYLD
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 18.51%
- 6M
- 19.88%
- 1Y
- 39.75%
- 3Y*
- 22.34%
- 5Y*
- 11.38%
- 10Y*
- 11.35%
ISRA vs. FYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISRA VanEck Israel ETF | 14.05% | 36.98% | 26.03% | -0.08% | -25.76% | 10.06% | 28.21% | 26.77% | -7.04% | 15.07% |
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 18.51% | 34.53% | 3.00% | 13.18% | -5.53% | 18.67% | 4.17% | 17.83% | -14.47% | 29.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISRA and FYLD is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2013 | 0.53 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ISRA and FYLD has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
ISRA vs. FYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ISRA
FYLD
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Financial Services
ISRA
FYLD
Technology
ISRA
FYLD
Healthcare
ISRA
FYLD
-
Industrials
ISRA
FYLD
Utilities
ISRA
FYLD
Real Estate
ISRA
FYLD
-
Energy
ISRA
FYLD
Consumer Cyclical
ISRA
FYLD
Communication Services
ISRA
FYLD
Consumer Defensive
ISRA
FYLD
Basic Materials
ISRA
FYLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISRA vs. FYLD — Risk / Return Rank
ISRA
FYLD
ISRA vs. FYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) and Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISRA | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.62 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.83 | 7.35 | -3.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.53 | 26.30 | -11.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISRA | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 3.48 | -1.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.71 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.63 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.45 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
ISRA vs. FYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISRA drawdown since its inception was -45.02%, roughly equal to the maximum FYLD drawdown of -44.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISRA and FYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISRA | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.02% | -44.55% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.02% | -5.44% | -5.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.74% | -15.15% | -12.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.02% | -25.12% | -19.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.02% | -44.55% | -0.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.73% | -1.54% | -3.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.19% | -8.83% | -2.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 1.52% | +1.38% |
Volatility
ISRA vs. FYLD - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) has a higher volatility of 5.30% compared to Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) at 3.00%. This indicates that ISRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISRA | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.30% | 3.00% | +2.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.91% | 8.78% | +6.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.84% | 11.50% | +9.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.87% | 16.23% | +5.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.91% | 18.03% | +2.88% |
ISRA vs. FYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ISRA and FYLD have an expense ratio of 0.59%.
Dividends
ISRA vs. FYLD - Dividend Comparison
ISRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than FYLD's 3.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 3.65% | 4.07% | 5.41% | 6.06% | 6.13% | 4.74% | 3.94% | 3.73% | 5.17% | 2.85% | 2.72% | 3.98% |
ISRA VanEck Israel ETF | 1.30% | 1.48% | 1.21% | 1.89% | 1.36% | 1.28% | 0.17% | 1.38% | 0.76% | 1.58% | 1.62% | 1.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISRA and FYLD have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ISRA has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to FYLD (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISRA dropped -45.02% vs FYLD's -44.55%.
On 10-year performance, FYLD leads with 11.35% vs 10.83% for ISRA. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, FYLD has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FYLD has performed better with a 11.35% return vs 10.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISRA and FYLD have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.
FYLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 1.30% for ISRA.
They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Cambria.
FYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.48 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISRA and FYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer