ISRA vs. ACTV
ISRA (VanEck Israel ETF) and ACTV (LeaderShares Activist Leaders ETF) are both Global Equities funds. ISRA is passively managed, while ACTV is actively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ISRA charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ACTV.
Performance
ISRA vs. ACTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ISRA
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- -1.80%
- YTD
- 14.05%
- 6M
- 17.88%
- 1Y
- 41.95%
- 3Y*
- 26.30%
- 5Y*
- 9.13%
- 10Y*
- 10.83%
ACTV
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISRA vs. ACTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISRA VanEck Israel ETF | 14.05% | 36.98% | 26.03% | -0.08% | -25.76% | 10.06% | 20.20% |
ACTV LeaderShares Activist Leaders ETF | 0.00% | 3.13% | -1.70% | 15.22% | -19.33% | 25.52% | 27.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISRA and ACTV is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2020 | 0.62 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ISRA and ACTV has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
ISRA vs. ACTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ISRA
ACTV
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Real Estate
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Financial Services
ISRA
ACTV
Technology
ISRA
ACTV
Healthcare
ISRA
ACTV
Industrials
ISRA
ACTV
Utilities
ISRA
ACTV
Real Estate
ISRA
ACTV
Energy
ISRA
ACTV
Consumer Cyclical
ISRA
ACTV
Communication Services
ISRA
ACTV
Consumer Defensive
ISRA
ACTV
Basic Materials
ISRA
ACTV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISRA vs. ACTV — Risk / Return Rank
ISRA
ACTV
ISRA vs. ACTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) and LeaderShares Activist Leaders ETF (ACTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISRA | ACTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.83 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.53 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISRA | ACTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | — | — |
Drawdowns
ISRA vs. ACTV - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISRA | ACTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.73% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.19% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | — | — |
Volatility
ISRA vs. ACTV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISRA | ACTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.30% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.91% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.84% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.87% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.91% | — | — |
ISRA vs. ACTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISRA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than ACTV's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISRA vs. ACTV - Dividend Comparison
ISRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, more than ACTV's 1.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACTV LeaderShares Activist Leaders ETF | 1.28% | 1.28% | 0.80% | 1.18% | 0.28% | 7.63% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ISRA VanEck Israel ETF | 1.30% | 1.48% | 1.21% | 1.89% | 1.36% | 1.28% | 0.17% | 1.38% | 0.76% | 1.58% | 1.62% | 1.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISRA and ACTV have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ISRA is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISRA is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ACTV.
ISRA has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 1.28% for ACTV.
They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Redwood. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ISRA and 0.75% for ACTV.
Find the right allocation for ISRA and ACTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer