ISPE.L vs. WRDA.L
ISPE.L (iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF) and WRDA.L (UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Global Equities funds - ISPE.L tracks the iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF while WRDA.L tracks the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ISPE.L returned 17.47% vs 22.06% for WRDA.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ISPE.L charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for WRDA.L.
Performance
ISPE.L vs. WRDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ISPE.L is traded in GBP, while WRDA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the WRDA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ISPE.L having a 10.81% return and WRDA.L slightly lower at 10.72%.
ISPE.L
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 7.91%
- YTD
- 10.81%
- 1Y
- 17.47%
- 3Y*
- 12.67%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WRDA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 9.40%
- YTD
- 10.72%
- 1Y
- 22.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISPE.L vs. WRDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ISPE.L iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF | 10.81% | 11.30% | 11.69% |
WRDA.L UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc | 10.72% | 12.77% | 20.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISPE.L and WRDA.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024 | 0.64 |
The correlation between ISPE.L and WRDA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISPE.L vs. WRDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
ISPE.L
WRDA.L
ISPE.L vs. WRDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF (ISPE.L) and UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISPE.L | WRDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.37 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.74 | 0.81 | +1.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.72 | 1.18 | +8.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISPE.L vs. WRDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISPE.L drawdown since its inception was -18.22%, smaller than the maximum WRDA.L drawdown of -27.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISPE.L and WRDA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISPE.L | WRDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.22% | -27.39% | +9.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.90% | -27.39% | +20.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.01% | -15.98% | +14.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.73% | -8.18% | +4.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 18.75% | -16.80% |
Volatility
ISPE.L vs. WRDA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF (ISPE.L) has a higher volatility of 2.86% compared to UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L) at 2.72%. This indicates that ISPE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WRDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISPE.L | WRDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.86% | 2.72% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.96% | 7.90% | +0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.88% | 43.22% | -32.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.63% | 29.46% | -14.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.63% | 29.46% | -14.83% |
ISPE.L vs. WRDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISPE.L has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than WRDA.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ISPE.L vs. WRDA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ISPE.L nor WRDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ISPE.L and WRDA.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WRDA.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WRDA.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for ISPE.L.
ISPE.L tracks iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF, while WRDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for ISPE.L and 0.06% for WRDA.L.
Find the right allocation for ISPE.L and WRDA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer