ISPE.L vs. ISAC.L
ISPE.L (iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF) and ISAC.L (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds from iShares - ISPE.L tracks the iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF while ISAC.L tracks the MSCI All Country World Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ISPE.L returned 12.67%/yr vs 17.72%/yr for ISAC.L. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ISPE.L charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ISAC.L.
Performance
ISPE.L vs. ISAC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ISPE.L is traded in GBP, while ISAC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ISAC.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ISPE.L having a 10.81% return and ISAC.L slightly lower at 10.73%.
ISPE.L
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 7.91%
- YTD
- 10.81%
- 1Y
- 17.47%
- 3Y*
- 12.67%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISAC.L
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -1.47%
- 6M
- 9.00%
- YTD
- 10.73%
- 1Y
- 22.42%
- 3Y*
- 17.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.51%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
ISPE.L vs. ISAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISPE.L iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF | 10.81% | 11.30% | 11.48% | 12.23% | -3.77% |
ISAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.73% | 13.64% | 19.87% | 16.44% | -3.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISPE.L and ISAC.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2022 | 0.68 |
The correlation between ISPE.L and ISAC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISPE.L vs. ISAC.L — Risk / Return Rank
ISPE.L
ISAC.L
ISPE.L vs. ISAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF (ISPE.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISPE.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.33 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.74 | 3.25 | -0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.72 | 11.85 | -2.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISPE.L vs. ISAC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISPE.L drawdown since its inception was -18.22%, smaller than the maximum ISAC.L drawdown of -25.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISPE.L and ISAC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISPE.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.22% | -25.84% | +7.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.90% | -6.88% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.22% | -18.33% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.01% | -2.45% | +1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.73% | -3.51% | -0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 1.89% | +0.06% |
Volatility
ISPE.L vs. ISAC.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF (ISPE.L) is 2.86%, while iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) has a volatility of 3.31%. This indicates that ISPE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISAC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISPE.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.86% | 3.31% | -0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.96% | 10.05% | -2.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.88% | 12.43% | -1.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.63% | 14.39% | +0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.63% | 15.40% | -0.77% |
ISPE.L vs. ISAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISPE.L has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than ISAC.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ISPE.L vs. ISAC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ISPE.L nor ISAC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ISPE.L and ISAC.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ISPE.L is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISPE.L is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ISAC.L.
ISPE.L tracks iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF, while ISAC.L tracks MSCI All Country World Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.17% for ISPE.L and 0.20% for ISAC.L.
Find the right allocation for ISPE.L and ISAC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer