ISP6.L vs. EMIM.L
ISP6.L (iShares S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF) and EMIM.L (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - ISP6.L is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 TR USD, while EMIM.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (IMI). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ISP6.L returned 10.03%/yr vs 9.04%/yr for EMIM.L. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ISP6.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EMIM.L.
Performance
ISP6.L vs. EMIM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISP6.L achieves a 19.86% return, which is significantly higher than EMIM.L's 18.12% return. Over the past 10 years, ISP6.L has outperformed EMIM.L with an annualized return of 10.03%, while EMIM.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.04% annualized return.
ISP6.L
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 14.94%
- YTD
- 19.86%
- 1Y
- 30.11%
- 3Y*
- 13.21%
- 5Y*
- 7.80%
- 10Y*
- 10.03%
EMIM.L
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- -6.46%
- 6M
- 13.01%
- YTD
- 18.12%
- 1Y
- 33.59%
- 3Y*
- 18.17%
- 5Y*
- 7.68%
- 10Y*
- 9.04%
ISP6.L vs. EMIM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISP6.L iShares S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF | 19.86% | -0.91% | 8.76% | 10.98% | -6.72% | 27.86% | 6.87% | 17.51% | -4.56% | 3.05% |
EMIM.L iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 18.12% | 23.35% | 9.18% | 4.93% | -10.17% | 0.74% | 14.91% | 12.69% | -9.32% | 24.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISP6.L and EMIM.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2014 | 0.55 |
The correlation between ISP6.L and EMIM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (3 years) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISP6.L vs. EMIM.L — Risk / Return Rank
ISP6.L
EMIM.L
ISP6.L vs. EMIM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF (ISP6.L) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISP6.L | EMIM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.33 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.65 | 3.06 | +1.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.94 | 9.23 | +4.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISP6.L vs. EMIM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISP6.L drawdown since its inception was -66.35%, which is greater than EMIM.L's maximum drawdown of -31.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISP6.L and EMIM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISP6.L | EMIM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.35% | -31.70% | -34.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.45% | -10.92% | +4.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.26% | -15.56% | -14.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.26% | -20.99% | -9.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.08% | -26.46% | -12.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.19% | -9.30% | +6.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.49% | -8.67% | -6.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 3.63% | -1.48% |
Volatility
ISP6.L vs. EMIM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF (ISP6.L) is 4.29%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L) has a volatility of 8.56%. This indicates that ISP6.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMIM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISP6.L | EMIM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.29% | 8.56% | -4.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.90% | 17.15% | -6.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.40% | 19.18% | -3.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.08% | 16.40% | +2.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.38% | 18.00% | +2.38% |
ISP6.L vs. EMIM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISP6.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than EMIM.L's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISP6.L vs. EMIM.L - Dividend Comparison
ISP6.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, while EMIM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMIM.L iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ISP6.L iShares S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF | 0.49% | 1.22% | 1.15% | 1.08% | 1.00% | 0.65% | 0.94% | 0.97% | 0.96% | 0.78% | 0.77% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISP6.L and EMIM.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EMIM.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMIM.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ISP6.L.
ISP6.L is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while EMIM.L is Emerging Markets Equities. ISP6.L tracks Russell 2000 TR USD, while EMIM.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (IMI). Their fees differ too: 0.40% for ISP6.L and 0.18% for EMIM.L.
Find the right allocation for ISP6.L and EMIM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer