ISNQX vs. LTTIX

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

ISNQX (Voya Solution 2050 Portfolio) and LTTIX (MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ISNQX charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for LTTIX.

Performance

ISNQX vs. LTTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Solution 2050 Portfolio (ISNQX) and MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ISNQX

• 1D: 1.11%
• 1M: 0.86%
• 6M: 8.57%
• YTD: 11.68%
• 1Y: 21.14%
• 3Y*: 17.92%
• 5Y*: 9.31%
• 10Y*: 11.10%
• ALL TIME*: 11.60%

LTTIX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ISNQX Voya Solution 2050 Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

ISNQX vs. LTTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ISNQX Voya Solution 2050 Portfolio	11.68%	20.04%	15.16%	20.86%	-19.16%	17.44%	16.39%	24.65%	-10.36%	22.00%
LTTIX MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund	2.74%	9.29%	6.73%	10.36%	-12.36%	8.61%	10.61%	17.82%	-3.97%	13.16%

Correlation

The correlation between ISNQX and LTTIX is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013	0.90

Over the past year, the correlation between ISNQX and LTTIX has dropped to 0.67 - well below their long-term average of 0.90, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

ISNQX vs. LTTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ISNQX

ISNQX Risk / Return Rank: 75
ISNQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
ISNQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
ISNQX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
ISNQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
ISNQX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

LTTIX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ISNQX vs. LTTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Solution 2050 Portfolio (ISNQX) and MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ISNQX	LTTIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.69	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.88	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ISNQX	LTTIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.79%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.71%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.55%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.05%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ISNQX	LTTIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.91%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.64%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.17%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.45%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.30%	—	—

ISNQX vs. LTTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISNQX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than LTTIX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ISNQX vs. LTTIX - Dividend Comparison

ISNQX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LTTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.54%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ISNQX Voya Solution 2050 Portfolio	0.00%	8.01%	1.33%	6.04%	31.37%	2.78%	6.32%	8.18%	6.96%	1.98%	1.14%	7.90%
LTTIX MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund	11.54%	8.13%	7.07%	3.30%	5.88%	7.35%	2.83%	3.68%	4.32%	3.51%	4.03%	1.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ISNQX and LTTIX in my portfolio?

ISNQX and LTTIX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.