PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISMF vs. SPGM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ISMF vs. SPGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Managed Futures Active ETF (ISMF) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ISMF vs. SPGM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISMF achieves a 3.84% return, which is significantly higher than SPGM's -1.30% return.


ISMF

1D
0.21%
1M
-1.88%
YTD
3.84%
6M
9.57%
1Y
15.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPGM

1D
3.20%
1M
-6.16%
YTD
-1.30%
6M
2.27%
1Y
23.79%
3Y*
17.35%
5Y*
9.70%
10Y*
11.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ISMF vs. SPGM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISMF has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than SPGM's 0.09% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ISMF vs. SPGM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISMF
ISMF Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ISMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISMF Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ISMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISMF Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

SPGM
SPGM Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SPGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPGM Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SPGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPGM Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISMF vs. SPGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Managed Futures Active ETF (ISMF) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISMFSPGMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.84

1.37

+0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.44

1.98

+0.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.30

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

1.99

+1.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.89

9.40

-1.51

ISMF vs. SPGM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISMF Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the SPGM Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISMF and SPGM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISMFSPGMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

1.37

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.87

0.60

+1.27

Correlation

The correlation between ISMF and SPGM is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ISMF vs. SPGM - Dividend Comparison

ISMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.00%, more than SPGM's 1.91% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISMF
iShares Managed Futures Active ETF
6.00%6.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPGM
SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF
1.91%1.89%1.98%2.09%2.37%1.94%1.45%2.46%1.89%2.29%1.87%3.70%

Drawdowns

ISMF vs. SPGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISMF drawdown since its inception was -4.23%, smaller than the maximum SPGM drawdown of -33.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISMF and SPGM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ISMFSPGMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.23%

-33.97%

+29.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.23%

-11.96%

+7.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.10%

-6.60%

+4.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.41%

-4.85%

+3.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

2.53%

-0.60%

Volatility

ISMF vs. SPGM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Managed Futures Active ETF (ISMF) is 2.90%, while SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) has a volatility of 6.58%. This indicates that ISMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ISMFSPGMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

6.58%

-3.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.19%

10.18%

-2.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.24%

17.47%

-9.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.10%

15.95%

-7.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.10%

17.56%

-9.46%