ISMF vs. SPGM
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Managed Futures Active ETF (ISMF) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM).
ISMF and SPGM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ISMF is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Mar 12, 2025. SPGM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI AC World IMI. It was launched on Feb 27, 2012.
Performance
ISMF vs. SPGM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ISMF vs. SPGM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ISMF iShares Managed Futures Active ETF | 3.84% | 11.58% |
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF | -1.30% | 26.46% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISMF achieves a 3.84% return, which is significantly higher than SPGM's -1.30% return.
ISMF
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.88%
- YTD
- 3.84%
- 6M
- 9.57%
- 1Y
- 15.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPGM
- 1D
- 3.20%
- 1M
- -6.16%
- YTD
- -1.30%
- 6M
- 2.27%
- 1Y
- 23.79%
- 3Y*
- 17.35%
- 5Y*
- 9.70%
- 10Y*
- 11.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ISMF vs. SPGM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISMF has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than SPGM's 0.09% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ISMF vs. SPGM — Risk / Return Rank
ISMF
SPGM
ISMF vs. SPGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Managed Futures Active ETF (ISMF) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISMF | SPGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.84 | 1.37 | +0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.44 | 1.98 | +0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.30 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.60 | 1.99 | +1.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.89 | 9.40 | -1.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISMF | SPGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | 1.37 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.87 | 0.60 | +1.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between ISMF and SPGM is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ISMF vs. SPGM - Dividend Comparison
ISMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.00%, more than SPGM's 1.91% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISMF iShares Managed Futures Active ETF | 6.00% | 6.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF | 1.91% | 1.89% | 1.98% | 2.09% | 2.37% | 1.94% | 1.45% | 2.46% | 1.89% | 2.29% | 1.87% | 3.70% |
Drawdowns
ISMF vs. SPGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISMF drawdown since its inception was -4.23%, smaller than the maximum SPGM drawdown of -33.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISMF and SPGM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISMF | SPGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.23% | -33.97% | +29.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.23% | -11.96% | +7.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.10% | -6.60% | +4.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.41% | -4.85% | +3.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 2.53% | -0.60% |
Volatility
ISMF vs. SPGM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Managed Futures Active ETF (ISMF) is 2.90%, while SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) has a volatility of 6.58%. This indicates that ISMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ISMF | SPGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.90% | 6.58% | -3.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.19% | 10.18% | -2.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.24% | 17.47% | -9.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.10% | 15.95% | -7.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.10% | 17.56% | -9.46% |