PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISMD vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISMD vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF (ISMD) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISMD achieves a 30.34% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 68.39% return.


ISMD

1D
1.26%
1M
4.43%
6M
20.30%
YTD
30.34%
1Y
39.84%
3Y*
16.31%
5Y*
10.69%
10Y*

DBE

1D
-1.09%
1M
6.25%
6M
65.69%
YTD
68.39%
1Y
57.64%
3Y*
17.96%
5Y*
17.10%
10Y*
11.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISMD vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISMD
Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF
30.34%4.14%9.53%16.74%-13.44%29.38%7.45%24.62%-12.63%8.73%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
68.39%-2.17%2.96%-12.14%33.77%57.56%-25.91%19.72%-12.95%11.77%

Correlation

The correlation between ISMD and DBE is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2017

0.20

The correlation between ISMD and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISMD vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISMD
ISMD Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ISMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISMD Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ISMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISMD Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISMD vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF (ISMD) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ISMDDBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.28

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.15

2.34

+1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.10

7.00

+6.10

ISMD vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISMD Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISMD and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ISMD vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISMD drawdown since its inception was -44.60%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISMD and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISMDDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.60%

-86.69%

+42.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.64%

-24.72%

+15.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.64%

-24.72%

-1.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.64%

-38.74%

+12.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-36.07%

+35.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.08%

-57.19%

+49.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

8.26%

-5.21%

Volatility

ISMD vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF (ISMD) is 4.20%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 11.68%. This indicates that ISMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISMDDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.20%

11.68%

-7.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.93%

32.70%

-19.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.37%

35.99%

-17.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.83%

29.88%

-9.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.66%

28.39%

-4.73%

ISMD vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISMD has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISMD vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

ISMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than DBE's 2.29% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.29%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%0.00%
ISMD
Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF
1.10%1.21%1.24%1.17%1.28%9.35%0.99%0.88%1.35%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISMD and DBE have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (11.68%) compared to ISMD (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISMD dropped -44.60% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 5-year performance, DBE leads with 17.10% vs 10.69% for ISMD. On fees, ISMD is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, ISMD has been the lower-risk option at 4.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBE has performed better with a 17.10% return vs 10.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISMD is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.29%, compared with 1.10% for ISMD.

ISMD is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while DBE is Oil & Gas. ISMD tracks Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact Equal Weight Index, while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for ISMD and 0.78% for DBE.

ISMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISMD and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer