ISMD vs. BBSC
ISMD (Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF) and BBSC (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - ISMD tracks the Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact Equal Weight Index while BBSC tracks the Morningstar US Small Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ISMD returned 7.62%/yr vs 6.64%/yr for BBSC. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ISMD charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for BBSC.
Performance
ISMD vs. BBSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISMD achieves a 21.54% return, which is significantly higher than BBSC's 15.75% return.
ISMD
- 1D
- -1.62%
- 1M
- 5.36%
- YTD
- 21.54%
- 6M
- 20.97%
- 1Y
- 36.88%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 7.62%
- 10Y*
- —
BBSC
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 2.71%
- YTD
- 15.75%
- 6M
- 14.20%
- 1Y
- 35.98%
- 3Y*
- 17.34%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- —
ISMD vs. BBSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISMD Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF | 21.54% | 4.14% | 9.53% | 16.74% | -13.44% | 29.38% | 9.29% |
BBSC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | 15.75% | 10.38% | 12.31% | 20.07% | -19.75% | 15.44% | 11.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISMD and BBSC is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2020 | 0.94 |
The correlation between ISMD and BBSC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
ISMD vs. BBSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ISMD
BBSC
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
ISMD
BBSC
Technology
ISMD
BBSC
Financial Services
ISMD
BBSC
Consumer Cyclical
ISMD
BBSC
Healthcare
ISMD
BBSC
Real Estate
ISMD
BBSC
Consumer Defensive
ISMD
BBSC
Basic Materials
ISMD
BBSC
Energy
ISMD
BBSC
Utilities
ISMD
BBSC
Communication Services
ISMD
BBSC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISMD vs. BBSC — Risk / Return Rank
ISMD
BBSC
ISMD vs. BBSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF (ISMD) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISMD | BBSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.01 | 1.90 | +0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.82 | 2.70 | +0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.32 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.84 | 3.79 | +0.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.04 | 12.35 | -0.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISMD | BBSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | 1.90 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.29 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.49 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
ISMD vs. BBSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISMD drawdown since its inception was -44.60%, which is greater than BBSC's maximum drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISMD and BBSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISMD | BBSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.60% | -30.96% | -13.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.64% | -9.54% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.64% | -29.32% | +2.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.64% | -30.96% | +4.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.62% | -1.48% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.17% | -11.49% | +3.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 2.92% | +0.15% |
Volatility
ISMD vs. BBSC - Volatility Comparison
Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF (ISMD) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) have volatilities of 4.95% and 4.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISMD | BBSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.95% | 4.91% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.52% | 12.98% | -0.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.56% | 19.12% | -0.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.87% | 22.93% | -2.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.74% | 22.86% | +0.88% |
ISMD vs. BBSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISMD has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than BBSC's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISMD vs. BBSC - Dividend Comparison
ISMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than BBSC's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBSC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.29% | 1.58% | 1.37% | 1.06% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ISMD Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF | 0.95% | 1.21% | 1.24% | 1.17% | 1.28% | 9.35% | 0.99% | 0.88% | 1.35% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, ISMD and BBSC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ISMD has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to BBSC (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISMD dropped -44.60% vs BBSC's -30.96%.
On 5-year performance, ISMD leads with 7.62% vs 6.64% for BBSC. On fees, BBSC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ISMD has performed better with a 7.62% return vs 6.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBSC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for ISMD.
BBSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.95% for ISMD.
ISMD tracks Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact Equal Weight Index, while BBSC tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for ISMD and 0.09% for BBSC.
ISMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISMD and BBSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer