ISMD vs. ABLS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ISMD (Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF) and ABLS (Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - ISMD tracks the Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact Equal Weight Index while ABLS tracks the Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ISMD returned 36.88% vs 0.04% for ABLS. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ISMD charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ABLS.

Performance

ISMD vs. ABLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF (ISMD) and Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISMD achieves a 21.54% return, which is significantly higher than ABLS's 2.75% return.

ISMD

• 1D: -1.62%
• 1M: 5.36%
• YTD: 21.54%
• 6M: 20.97%
• 1Y: 36.88%
• 3Y*: 16.11%
• 5Y*: 7.62%
• 10Y*: —

ABLS

• 1D: -0.92%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 2.75%
• 6M: -0.23%
• 1Y: 0.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISMD vs. ABLS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ISMD Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF	21.54%	2.96%
ABLS Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF	2.75%	-8.72%

Correlation

The correlation between ISMD and ABLS is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.80

The correlation between ISMD and ABLS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ISMD vs. ABLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISMD

ISMD Risk / Return Rank: 63
ISMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
ISMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
ISMD Omega Ratio Rank: 55
ISMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
ISMD Martin Ratio Rank: 66

ABLS

ABLS Risk / Return Rank: 9
ABLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
ABLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
ABLS Omega Ratio Rank: 9
ABLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
ABLS Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISMD vs. ABLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF (ISMD) and Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ISMD	ABLS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	0.00	+2.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.82	0.13	+2.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.01	+0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.84	0.00	+3.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.04	0.01	+12.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ISMD vs. ABLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISMD Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the ABLS Sharpe Ratio of 0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISMD and ABLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ISMD	ABLS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.01	0.00	+2.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	-0.23	+0.63

Drawdowns

ISMD vs. ABLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISMD drawdown since its inception was -44.60%, which is greater than ABLS's maximum drawdown of -19.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISMD and ABLS.

Drawdown Indicators

	ISMD	ABLS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.60%	-19.28%	-25.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.64%	-16.19%	+6.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.64%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.62%	-6.21%	+4.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.17%	-8.45%	+0.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.07%	5.82%	-2.75%

Volatility

ISMD vs. ABLS - Volatility Comparison

Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF (ISMD) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) at 3.80%. This indicates that ISMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ISMD	ABLS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.95%	3.80%	+1.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.52%	12.68%	-0.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.56%	17.35%	+1.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.87%	21.25%	-0.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.74%	21.25%	+2.49%

ISMD vs. ABLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISMD has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than ABLS's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

ISMD vs. ABLS - Dividend Comparison

ISMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than ABLS's 13.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ABLS Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF	13.68%	14.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ISMD Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF	0.95%	1.21%	1.24%	1.17%	1.28%	9.35%	0.99%	0.88%	1.35%	2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ISMD and ABLS in my portfolio?

ISMD and ABLS have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ISMD or ABLS?

ISMD has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to ABLS (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISMD dropped -44.60% vs ABLS's -19.28%.

Which ETF is better, ISMD or ABLS?

On 1-year performance, ISMD leads with 36.88% vs 0.04% for ABLS. On fees, ABLS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, ABLS has been the lower-risk option at 3.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ISMD or ABLS?

Over the 1-year period, ISMD has performed better with a 36.88% return vs 0.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ISMD or ABLS?

ABLS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for ISMD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ISMD or ABLS?

ABLS has the higher dividend yield at 13.68%, compared with 0.95% for ISMD.

What is the main difference between ISMD and ABLS?

ISMD tracks Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact Equal Weight Index, while ABLS tracks Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and Abacus. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for ISMD and 0.39% for ABLS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ISMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.