ISLN.L vs. IWFQ.L
ISLN.L (iShares Physical Silver ETC) and IWFQ.L (iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS) are both exchange-traded funds - ISLN.L is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while IWFQ.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ISLN.L returned 12.41%/yr vs 12.62%/yr for IWFQ.L. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ISLN.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IWFQ.L.
Performance
ISLN.L vs. IWFQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ISLN.L is traded in USD, while IWFQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IWFQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISLN.L achieves a -17.75% return, which is significantly lower than IWFQ.L's 7.47% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ISLN.L having a 12.41% annualized return and IWFQ.L not far ahead at 12.62%.
ISLN.L
- 1D
- -5.08%
- 1M
- -22.26%
- YTD
- -17.75%
- 6M
- -18.61%
- 1Y
- 64.79%
- 3Y*
- 37.83%
- 5Y*
- 17.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.41%
IWFQ.L
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- YTD
- 7.47%
- 6M
- 7.30%
- 1Y
- 19.90%
- 3Y*
- 17.50%
- 5Y*
- 9.90%
- 10Y*
- 12.62%
ISLN.L vs. IWFQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | -17.75% | 147.62% | 21.10% | -0.76% | 3.39% | -12.85% | 45.85% | 16.36% | -8.76% | 3.66% |
IWFQ.L iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS | 7.47% | 15.51% | 16.94% | 25.44% | -19.22% | 24.04% | 14.33% | 30.91% | -7.87% | 23.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISLN.L and IWFQ.L is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2014 | 0.18 |
The correlation between ISLN.L and IWFQ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISLN.L vs. IWFQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
ISLN.L
IWFQ.L
ISLN.L vs. IWFQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Silver ETC (ISLN.L) and iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWFQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISLN.L | IWFQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.32 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | 2.23 | -0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.07 | 9.55 | -6.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISLN.L vs. IWFQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISLN.L drawdown since its inception was -76.69%, which is greater than IWFQ.L's maximum drawdown of -41.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISLN.L and IWFQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISLN.L | IWFQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.69% | -41.23% | -35.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.23% | -8.90% | -39.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.23% | -19.07% | -29.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.23% | -28.30% | -19.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.23% | -32.13% | -16.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.23% | -2.00% | -46.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.70% | -14.23% | -39.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.07% | 2.08% | +18.99% |
Volatility
ISLN.L vs. IWFQ.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Silver ETC (ISLN.L) has a higher volatility of 15.42% compared to iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWFQ.L) at 3.09%. This indicates that ISLN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWFQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISLN.L | IWFQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.42% | 3.09% | +12.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.66% | 8.71% | +46.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.84% | 11.17% | +47.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.04% | 20.54% | +15.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.26% | 18.19% | +13.07% |
ISLN.L vs. IWFQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISLN.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IWFQ.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISLN.L vs. IWFQ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ISLN.L nor IWFQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ISLN.L and IWFQ.L have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ISLN.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISLN.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IWFQ.L.
ISLN.L is categorized as Silver, while IWFQ.L is Global Equities. ISLN.L tracks LBMA Silver Price, while IWFQ.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ISLN.L and 0.30% for IWFQ.L.
Find the right allocation for ISLN.L and IWFQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer