PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISJP.L vs. CNKY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISJP.L vs. CNKY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF (Dist) (ISJP.L) and iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc) (CNKY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISJP.L achieves a 15.08% return, which is significantly lower than CNKY.L's 31.80% return. Over the past 10 years, ISJP.L has underperformed CNKY.L with an annualized return of 8.58%, while CNKY.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.70% annualized return.


ISJP.L

1D
0.31%
1M
5.68%
YTD
15.08%
6M
15.82%
1Y
31.49%
3Y*
14.99%
5Y*
8.64%
10Y*
8.58%

CNKY.L

1D
-1.22%
1M
10.78%
YTD
31.80%
6M
29.05%
1Y
63.73%
3Y*
20.46%
5Y*
12.16%
10Y*
12.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISJP.L vs. CNKY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISJP.L
iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF (Dist)
15.08%20.89%4.99%7.01%-2.01%-2.01%4.51%13.94%-11.99%19.35%
CNKY.L
iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc)
31.80%20.64%9.15%15.02%-10.53%-4.18%21.18%16.38%-3.99%14.19%

Correlation

The correlation between ISJP.L and CNKY.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2010

0.75

The correlation between ISJP.L and CNKY.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.80 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISJP.L vs. CNKY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISJP.L
ISJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
ISJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ISJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

CNKY.L
CNKY.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
CNKY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNKY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNKY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
CNKY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNKY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISJP.L vs. CNKY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF (Dist) (ISJP.L) and iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc) (CNKY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISJP.LCNKY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.47

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

4.76

-1.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.66

14.40

-4.73

ISJP.L vs. CNKY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the CNKY.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISJP.L and CNKY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISJP.LCNKY.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

2.81

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.68

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.74

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.67

-0.18

Drawdowns

ISJP.L vs. CNKY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISJP.L drawdown since its inception was -32.93%, which is greater than CNKY.L's maximum drawdown of -23.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISJP.L and CNKY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISJP.LCNKY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.93%

-23.61%

-9.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.84%

-13.32%

+2.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.23%

-19.39%

+8.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.01%

-20.83%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.98%

-23.61%

-5.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

-1.22%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.22%

-7.33%

+1.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

4.41%

-1.16%

Volatility

ISJP.L vs. CNKY.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF (Dist) (ISJP.L) is 4.25%, while iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc) (CNKY.L) has a volatility of 6.86%. This indicates that ISJP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNKY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISJP.LCNKY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

6.86%

-2.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.34%

17.88%

-4.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.17%

22.59%

-7.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.22%

17.76%

-3.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.62%

17.22%

-1.60%

ISJP.L vs. CNKY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISJP.L has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than CNKY.L's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISJP.L vs. CNKY.L - Dividend Comparison

ISJP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, while CNKY.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNKY.L
iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ISJP.L
iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF (Dist)
1.67%1.85%1.73%1.77%1.99%1.52%1.58%1.53%1.39%1.29%1.07%0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISJP.L and CNKY.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CNKY.L is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CNKY.L is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for ISJP.L.

ISJP.L tracks MSCI Japan Small Cap NR JPY, while CNKY.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for ISJP.L and 0.48% for CNKY.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISJP.L and CNKY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer