PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISHG vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISHG vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 1-3 Year International Treasury Bond ETF (ISHG) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISHG achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 85.31% return. Over the past 10 years, ISHG has underperformed BNO with an annualized return of -0.16%, while BNO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.13% annualized return.


ISHG

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.66%
YTD
0.09%
6M
1.04%
1Y
2.28%
3Y*
4.51%
5Y*
-1.16%
10Y*
-0.16%

BNO

1D
-2.71%
1M
-9.80%
YTD
85.31%
6M
79.66%
1Y
88.71%
3Y*
26.74%
5Y*
23.48%
10Y*
13.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISHG vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISHG
iShares 1-3 Year International Treasury Bond ETF
0.09%13.31%-4.16%3.76%-10.95%-7.05%7.47%-0.64%-3.54%10.91%
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
85.31%-5.44%9.67%-3.43%35.25%62.34%-38.23%36.01%-15.30%15.43%

Correlation

The correlation between ISHG and BNO is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2010

0.07

The correlation between ISHG and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.37 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISHG vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISHG
ISHG Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
ISHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISHG Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
ISHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISHG Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISHG vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 1-3 Year International Treasury Bond ETF (ISHG) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISHGBNODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.36

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.46

4.99

-4.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.15

9.39

-8.24

ISHG vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISHG Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISHG and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISHGBNODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

2.15

-1.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

0.67

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

0.36

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

0.14

-0.21

Drawdowns

ISHG vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISHG drawdown since its inception was -37.24%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISHG and BNO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISHGBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.24%

-87.06%

+49.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.02%

-17.87%

+12.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.21%

-23.75%

+15.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.96%

-33.70%

+9.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.56%

-75.18%

+49.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.16%

-12.72%

-9.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.43%

-40.16%

+21.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

9.48%

-7.50%

Volatility

ISHG vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 1-3 Year International Treasury Bond ETF (ISHG) is 1.64%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 14.12%. This indicates that ISHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISHGBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.64%

14.12%

-12.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.71%

36.21%

-31.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.47%

41.56%

-35.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.58%

35.40%

-27.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.93%

36.69%

-29.76%

ISHG vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISHG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISHG vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

ISHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ISHG
iShares 1-3 Year International Treasury Bond ETF
1.45%1.45%2.56%0.18%0.00%1.29%0.00%0.00%1.80%0.46%0.00%0.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISHG and BNO have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNO has higher volatility (14.12%) compared to ISHG (1.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISHG dropped -37.24% vs BNO's -87.06%.

On 10-year performance, BNO leads with 13.13% vs -0.16% for ISHG. On fees, ISHG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ISHG has been the lower-risk option at 1.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, BNO has performed better with a 13.13% return vs -0.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISHG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

ISHG has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

ISHG is categorized as International Government Bonds, while BNO is Oil & Gas. ISHG tracks S&P/Citigroup International Treasury Bond Index Ex-US 1-3 Year, while BNO tracks Front Month Brent Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ISHG and 0.90% for BNO.

BNO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISHG and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer