ISGLX vs. OBMCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Integrated Small Cap Growth Fund (ISGLX) and Oberweis Micro Cap Fund (OBMCX).
ISGLX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Jan 30, 2008. OBMCX is managed by Oberweis. It was launched on Dec 29, 1995.
Performance
ISGLX vs. OBMCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ISGLX vs. OBMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISGLX Columbia Integrated Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 20.26% | 17.89% | -19.47% |
OBMCX Oberweis Micro Cap Fund | 8.96% | 14.70% | 22.82% | 18.87% | -1.97% |
Returns By Period
ISGLX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OBMCX
- 1D
- -3.56%
- 1M
- -5.54%
- YTD
- 8.96%
- 6M
- 7.64%
- 1Y
- 43.65%
- 3Y*
- 18.71%
- 5Y*
- 14.63%
- 10Y*
- 18.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ISGLX vs. OBMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISGLX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than OBMCX's 1.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ISGLX vs. OBMCX — Risk / Return Rank
ISGLX
OBMCX
ISGLX vs. OBMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Integrated Small Cap Growth Fund (ISGLX) and Oberweis Micro Cap Fund (OBMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISGLX | OBMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.41 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between ISGLX and OBMCX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ISGLX vs. OBMCX - Dividend Comparison
ISGLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OBMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISGLX Columbia Integrated Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OBMCX Oberweis Micro Cap Fund | 1.29% | 1.41% | 2.53% | 0.00% | 1.37% | 24.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 19.67% | 11.76% | 0.05% | 3.07% |
Drawdowns
ISGLX vs. OBMCX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISGLX | OBMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -68.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -8.84% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -16.51% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.53% | — |
Volatility
ISGLX vs. OBMCX - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ISGLX | OBMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.54% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.92% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 27.25% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 26.10% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 25.70% | — |