ISFD.L vs. LCUK.L
ISFD.L (iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc)) and LCUK.L (Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) are both Europe Equities funds - ISFD.L tracks the FTSE 100 Index while LCUK.L tracks the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ISFD.L returned 13.12%/yr vs 10.84%/yr for LCUK.L. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ISFD.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for LCUK.L.
Performance
ISFD.L vs. LCUK.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ISFD.L is traded in USD, while LCUK.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the LCUK.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISFD.L achieves a 8.60% return, which is significantly higher than LCUK.L's 7.70% return.
ISFD.L
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- 6M
- 6.34%
- YTD
- 8.60%
- 1Y
- 20.92%
- 3Y*
- 15.50%
- 5Y*
- 13.12%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.55%
LCUK.L
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 3.41%
- 6M
- 5.56%
- YTD
- 7.70%
- 1Y
- 19.27%
- 3Y*
- 16.66%
- 5Y*
- 10.84%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.48%
ISFD.L vs. LCUK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISFD.L iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) | 8.60% | 25.94% | 9.52% | 8.45% | 5.93% | 17.43% | -11.32% | 19.80% | -3.71% |
LCUK.L Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 7.70% | 34.26% | 7.24% | 12.85% | -8.71% | 16.94% | -9.10% | 23.48% | -12.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISFD.L and LCUK.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2018 | 0.76 |
The correlation between ISFD.L and LCUK.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
ISFD.L vs. LCUK.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ISFD.L
LCUK.L
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Technology
Financial Services
ISFD.L
LCUK.L
Consumer Defensive
ISFD.L
LCUK.L
Industrials
ISFD.L
LCUK.L
Healthcare
ISFD.L
LCUK.L
Energy
ISFD.L
LCUK.L
Basic Materials
ISFD.L
LCUK.L
Consumer Cyclical
ISFD.L
LCUK.L
Utilities
ISFD.L
LCUK.L
Communication Services
ISFD.L
LCUK.L
Real Estate
ISFD.L
LCUK.L
Technology
ISFD.L
LCUK.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISFD.L vs. LCUK.L — Risk / Return Rank
ISFD.L
LCUK.L
ISFD.L vs. LCUK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (ISFD.L) and Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISFD.L | LCUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.25 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | 1.90 | +0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.41 | 5.84 | +1.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISFD.L vs. LCUK.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISFD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.97%, smaller than the maximum LCUK.L drawdown of -43.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISFD.L and LCUK.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISFD.L | LCUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.97% | -43.12% | +9.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.85% | -10.08% | +1.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.64% | -13.37% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.64% | -27.37% | +14.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.63% | -2.53% | +0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -7.15% | +2.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 3.29% | -0.47% |
Volatility
ISFD.L vs. LCUK.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (ISFD.L) is 2.92%, while Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L) has a volatility of 3.48%. This indicates that ISFD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCUK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISFD.L | LCUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.92% | 3.48% | -0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.67% | 11.83% | -2.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.23% | 14.04% | -2.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.72% | 16.63% | -3.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.61% | 18.74% | -3.13% |
ISFD.L vs. LCUK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISFD.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUK.L's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ISFD.L vs. LCUK.L - Dividend Comparison
ISFD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LCUK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISFD.L iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LCUK.L Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 2.81% | 3.04% | 3.68% | 3.05% | 3.93% | 3.87% | 2.99% | 3.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISFD.L and LCUK.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LCUK.L is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LCUK.L is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ISFD.L.
ISFD.L tracks FTSE 100 Index, while LCUK.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ISFD.L and 0.04% for LCUK.L.
Find the right allocation for ISFD.L and LCUK.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer