ISFD.L vs. CSP1.L
ISFD.L (iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc)) and CSP1.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ISFD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc), while CSP1.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ISFD.L returned 12.79%/yr vs 13.16%/yr for CSP1.L. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ISFD.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CSP1.L.
Performance
ISFD.L vs. CSP1.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ISFD.L is traded in USD, while CSP1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CSP1.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISFD.L achieves a 7.54% return, which is significantly lower than CSP1.L's 10.64% return.
ISFD.L
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- 6M
- 4.87%
- YTD
- 7.54%
- 1Y
- 20.88%
- 3Y*
- 16.48%
- 5Y*
- 12.79%
- 10Y*
- —
CSP1.L
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- 6M
- 10.36%
- YTD
- 10.64%
- 1Y
- 22.24%
- 3Y*
- 20.23%
- 5Y*
- 13.16%
- 10Y*
- 15.00%
ISFD.L vs. CSP1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISFD.L iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) | 7.54% | 25.94% | 9.52% | 8.45% | 5.93% | 17.43% | -11.32% | 19.80% | -6.68% | 2.38% |
CSP1.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.64% | 17.63% | 25.22% | 26.11% | -18.77% | 29.88% | 17.14% | 31.49% | -5.65% | 5.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISFD.L and CSP1.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2017 | 0.56 |
The correlation between ISFD.L and CSP1.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (3 years) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISFD.L vs. CSP1.L — Risk / Return Rank
ISFD.L
CSP1.L
ISFD.L vs. CSP1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (ISFD.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISFD.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.33 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | 2.55 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.41 | 10.42 | -3.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISFD.L vs. CSP1.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISFD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.97%, roughly equal to the maximum CSP1.L drawdown of -33.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISFD.L and CSP1.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISFD.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.97% | -33.51% | -0.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.85% | -8.68% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.64% | -19.33% | +6.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.64% | -25.16% | +12.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.60% | -0.22% | -2.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -4.07% | -0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 2.13% | +0.68% |
Volatility
ISFD.L vs. CSP1.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (ISFD.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) have volatilities of 3.07% and 3.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISFD.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.07% | 3.12% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.65% | 8.66% | +0.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.20% | 11.64% | -0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.77% | 20.99% | -8.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.61% | 18.84% | -3.23% |
ISFD.L vs. CSP1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISFD.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than CSP1.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ISFD.L vs. CSP1.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ISFD.L nor CSP1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ISFD.L and CSP1.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ISFD.L.
ISFD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while CSP1.L is S&P 500. ISFD.L tracks iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc), while CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ISFD.L and 0.07% for CSP1.L.
Find the right allocation for ISFD.L and CSP1.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer