PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISFD.L vs. FLXD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISFD.L vs. FLXD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (ISFD.L) and Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ISFD.L is traded in USD, while FLXD.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FLXD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISFD.L achieves a 8.60% return, which is significantly lower than FLXD.L's 9.17% return.


ISFD.L

1D
0.69%
1M
2.51%
6M
6.34%
YTD
8.60%
1Y
20.92%
3Y*
15.50%
5Y*
13.12%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.55%

FLXD.L

1D
0.18%
1M
1.03%
6M
9.36%
YTD
9.17%
1Y
16.47%
3Y*
19.33%
5Y*
11.66%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISFD.L vs. FLXD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISFD.L
iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc)
8.60%25.94%9.52%8.45%5.93%17.43%-11.32%19.80%-6.68%2.38%
FLXD.L
Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF
9.17%40.32%5.87%13.98%-5.90%8.65%4.23%22.14%-13.01%-1.72%

Correlation

The correlation between ISFD.L and FLXD.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2017

0.59

The correlation between ISFD.L and FLXD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

ISFD.L vs. FLXD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISFD.L
FLXD.L

Financial Services

26.0%
43.0%

Consumer Defensive

14.3%
3.8%

Industrials

13.8%
7.1%

Healthcare

13.7%
9.4%

Energy

9.9%
8.4%

Basic Materials

8.0%
6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.1%
1.2%

Utilities

4.9%
0.7%

Communication Services

2.3%
14.6%

Real Estate

1.0%
4.6%

Technology

0.9%
0.8%

Financial Services

ISFD.L
26.0%
FLXD.L
43.0%

Consumer Defensive

ISFD.L
14.3%
FLXD.L
3.8%

Industrials

ISFD.L
13.8%
FLXD.L
7.1%

Healthcare

ISFD.L
13.7%
FLXD.L
9.4%

Energy

ISFD.L
9.9%
FLXD.L
8.4%

Basic Materials

ISFD.L
8.0%
FLXD.L
6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

ISFD.L
5.1%
FLXD.L
1.2%

Utilities

ISFD.L
4.9%
FLXD.L
0.7%

Communication Services

ISFD.L
2.3%
FLXD.L
14.6%

Real Estate

ISFD.L
1.0%
FLXD.L
4.6%

Technology

ISFD.L
0.9%
FLXD.L
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISFD.L vs. FLXD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISFD.L
ISFD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
ISFD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISFD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISFD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ISFD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISFD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

FLXD.L
FLXD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FLXD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISFD.L vs. FLXD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (ISFD.L) and Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ISFD.LFLXD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.27

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

3.64

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.41

7.93

-0.52

ISFD.L vs. FLXD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISFD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the FLXD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISFD.L and FLXD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ISFD.L vs. FLXD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISFD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.97%, smaller than the maximum FLXD.L drawdown of -37.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISFD.L and FLXD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISFD.LFLXD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.97%

-37.68%

+3.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.85%

-4.50%

-4.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.64%

-10.10%

-2.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.64%

-26.68%

+14.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.63%

-2.67%

+1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.60%

-7.13%

+2.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

2.07%

+0.75%

Volatility

ISFD.L vs. FLXD.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (ISFD.L) and Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L) have volatilities of 2.92% and 2.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISFD.LFLXD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

2.91%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.67%

8.98%

+0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.23%

10.97%

+0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.72%

14.15%

-1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.61%

15.64%

-0.03%

ISFD.L vs. FLXD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISFD.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FLXD.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ISFD.L vs. FLXD.L - Dividend Comparison

ISFD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FLXD.L
Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF
4.00%4.20%4.36%4.96%5.02%4.72%3.57%4.56%5.43%
ISFD.L
iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISFD.L and FLXD.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ISFD.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ISFD.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FLXD.L.

ISFD.L tracks FTSE 100 Index, while FLXD.L tracks MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ISFD.L and 0.25% for FLXD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISFD.L and FLXD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer