ISF.L vs. INFR

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

ISF.L (iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist)) and INFR (ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ISF.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while INFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the RARE Global Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ISF.L returned 15.23%/yr vs 2.95%/yr for INFR. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ISF.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for INFR.

Performance

ISF.L vs. INFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) (ISF.L) and ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ISF.L is traded in GBp, while INFR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the INFR values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISF.L achieves a 7.07% return, which is significantly higher than INFR's 2.43% return.

ISF.L

• 1D: 1.50%
• 1M: 0.94%
• YTD: 7.07%
• 6M: 10.11%
• 1Y: 21.68%
• 3Y*: 15.23%
• 5Y*: 11.88%
• 10Y*: 9.81%

INFR

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 2.43%
• 6M: 2.95%
• 1Y: 9.05%
• 3Y*: 2.95%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISF.L vs. INFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ISF.L iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist)	7.07%	25.97%	9.28%	7.81%	0.33%
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF	2.43%	15.16%	-4.59%	-0.06%	0.21%

Correlation

The correlation between ISF.L and INFR is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2022	0.30

The correlation between ISF.L and INFR shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ISF.L vs. INFR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ISF.L	INFR
Financial Services	24.8%	-
Industrials	13.8%	27.5%
Healthcare	13.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	12.8%	-
Energy	11.9%	-
Basic Materials	8.6%	-
Utilities	5.3%	68.5%
Consumer Cyclical	4.7%	-
Communication Services	2.6%	-
Real Estate	0.9%	4.1%
Technology	0.8%	-

Return for Risk

ISF.L vs. INFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISF.L

ISF.L Risk / Return Rank: 63
ISF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
ISF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
ISF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 71
ISF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
ISF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 52

INFR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISF.L vs. INFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) (ISF.L) and ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ISF.L	INFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.93	1.18	+0.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.72	1.72	+1.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.21	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.40	1.75	+0.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.89	4.70	+3.20

ISF.L vs. INFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISF.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the INFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISF.L and INFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ISF.L vs. INFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISF.L drawdown since its inception was -45.00%, which is greater than INFR's maximum drawdown of -16.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISF.L and INFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	ISF.L	INFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.00%	-16.73%	-28.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.82%	-5.85%	-2.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.69%	-13.68%	+0.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.69%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.13%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.05%	-1.17%	-1.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.45%	-5.23%	-1.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.68%	2.15%	+0.53%

Volatility

ISF.L vs. INFR - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) (ISF.L) has a higher volatility of 3.51% compared to ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR) at 1.80%. This indicates that ISF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ISF.L	INFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.51%	1.80%	+1.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.53%	5.26%	+4.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.94%	8.65%	+2.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.59%	12.65%	-0.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.84%	12.65%	+2.19%

ISF.L vs. INFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISF.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than INFR's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

ISF.L vs. INFR - Dividend Comparison

ISF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, while INFR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF	2.49%	2.52%	2.36%	3.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ISF.L iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist)	1.71%	3.01%	3.71%	3.86%	3.75%	3.76%	3.11%	4.47%	4.44%	3.96%	3.79%	4.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ISF.L and INFR in my portfolio?

ISF.L and INFR have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ISF.L or INFR?

On fees, ISF.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ISF.L or INFR?

ISF.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for INFR.

What is the main difference between ISF.L and INFR?

ISF.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while INFR is Energy Equities. ISF.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while INFR tracks RARE Global Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ClearBridge. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for ISF.L and 0.59% for INFR.