ISF.L vs. IBTM.L
ISF.L (iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist)) and IBTM.L (iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - ISF.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while IBTM.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ISF.L returned 9.81%/yr vs 1.18%/yr for IBTM.L. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.07% expense ratio.
Performance
ISF.L vs. IBTM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ISF.L is traded in GBp, while IBTM.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IBTM.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISF.L achieves a 7.07% return, which is significantly higher than IBTM.L's -0.44% return. Over the past 10 years, ISF.L has outperformed IBTM.L with an annualized return of 9.81%, while IBTM.L has yielded a comparatively lower 1.18% annualized return.
ISF.L
- 1D
- 1.50%
- 1M
- 1.56%
- YTD
- 7.07%
- 6M
- 10.11%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 15.23%
- 5Y*
- 11.88%
- 10Y*
- 9.81%
IBTM.L
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- -0.44%
- 6M
- -0.61%
- 1Y
- 4.98%
- 3Y*
- 0.81%
- 5Y*
- -0.07%
- 10Y*
- 1.18%
ISF.L vs. IBTM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISF.L iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) | 7.07% | 25.97% | 9.28% | 7.81% | 4.83% | 17.68% | -11.67% | 17.11% | -8.96% | 13.10% |
IBTM.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist) | -0.44% | 0.89% | 1.46% | -2.26% | -4.74% | -1.77% | 6.02% | 5.50% | 6.50% | -6.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISF.L and IBTM.L is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2006 | -0.21 |
The correlation between ISF.L and IBTM.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (all time) to 0.04 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISF.L vs. IBTM.L — Risk / Return Rank
ISF.L
IBTM.L
ISF.L vs. IBTM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) (ISF.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISF.L | IBTM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.14 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | 0.89 | +1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.89 | 2.08 | +5.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISF.L vs. IBTM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISF.L drawdown since its inception was -45.00%, smaller than the maximum IBTM.L drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISF.L and IBTM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISF.L | IBTM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.00% | -52.39% | +7.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.82% | -5.57% | -3.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.69% | -7.57% | -5.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.69% | -16.29% | +3.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.13% | -26.54% | -7.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.05% | -21.38% | +18.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.45% | -20.63% | +14.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 2.38% | +0.30% |
Volatility
ISF.L vs. IBTM.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) (ISF.L) has a higher volatility of 3.51% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTM.L) at 1.55%. This indicates that ISF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISF.L | IBTM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.51% | 1.55% | +1.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.53% | 4.49% | +5.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.94% | 6.25% | +4.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.59% | 9.47% | +3.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.84% | 10.58% | +4.26% |
ISF.L vs. IBTM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ISF.L and IBTM.L have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ISF.L vs. IBTM.L - Dividend Comparison
ISF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than IBTM.L's 4.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTM.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist) | 4.36% | 4.19% | 3.94% | 3.16% | 1.96% | 1.14% | 1.69% | 2.53% | 2.34% | 2.02% | 1.79% | 1.97% |
ISF.L iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) | 1.71% | 3.01% | 3.71% | 3.86% | 3.75% | 3.76% | 3.11% | 4.47% | 4.44% | 3.96% | 3.79% | 4.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISF.L and IBTM.L have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.07% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISF.L and IBTM.L have the same expense ratio: 0.07% per year.
ISF.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while IBTM.L is Government Bonds. ISF.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while IBTM.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index.
Find the right allocation for ISF.L and IBTM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer