PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ISDW.L vs. ISDE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ISDW.L vs. ISDE.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ISDW.L (iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS) and ISDE.L (iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - ISDW.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Islamic Index, while ISDE.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Islamic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ISDW.L returned 11.23%/yr vs 13.09%/yr for ISDE.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ISDW.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for ISDE.L.

Performance

ISDW.L vs. ISDE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS (ISDW.L) and iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISDE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISDW.L achieves a 19.45% return, which is significantly lower than ISDE.L's 60.11% return. Over the past 10 years, ISDW.L has underperformed ISDE.L with an annualized return of 11.23%, while ISDE.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.09% annualized return.

ISDW.L

1D
-0.28%
1M
6.65%
YTD
19.45%
6M
20.26%
1Y
36.58%
3Y*
18.57%
5Y*
12.01%
10Y*
11.23%

ISDE.L

1D
-2.79%
1M
13.41%
YTD
60.11%
6M
64.90%
1Y
107.18%
3Y*
32.29%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
13.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISDW.L vs. ISDE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISDW.L
iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS		19.45%19.35%5.72%23.61%-11.80%21.40%8.33%21.16%-9.55%19.36%
ISDE.L
iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		60.11%40.46%-3.55%13.97%-22.72%2.64%22.21%19.39%-17.27%41.72%

Correlation

The correlation between ISDW.L and ISDE.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2008

0.64

The correlation between ISDW.L and ISDE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

ISDW.L vs. ISDE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ISDW.L
ISDE.L

Technology

43.8%
48.0%

Industrials

12.7%
8.6%

Energy

10.9%
10.1%

Healthcare

10.2%
4.8%

Basic Materials

9.6%
12.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
3.3%

Utilities

1.0%
2.3%

Communication Services

0.4%
0.9%

Real Estate

0.2%
0.9%

Financial Services

0.0%
3.7%

Technology

ISDW.L
43.8%
ISDE.L
48.0%

Industrials

ISDW.L
12.7%
ISDE.L
8.6%

Energy

ISDW.L
10.9%
ISDE.L
10.1%

Healthcare

ISDW.L
10.2%
ISDE.L
4.8%

Basic Materials

ISDW.L
9.6%
ISDE.L
12.2%

Consumer Cyclical

ISDW.L
7.1%
ISDE.L
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

ISDW.L
3.7%
ISDE.L
3.3%

Utilities

ISDW.L
1.0%
ISDE.L
2.3%

Communication Services

ISDW.L
0.4%
ISDE.L
0.9%

Real Estate

ISDW.L
0.2%
ISDE.L
0.9%

Financial Services

ISDW.L
0.0%
ISDE.L
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS

iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)

Often compared with ISDW.L:
ISDW.L vs. IGDA.LISDW.L vs. SPUSISDW.L vs. ISDU.LISDW.L vs. SPWOISDW.L vs. ISWD.LISDW.L vs. UMMAISDW.L vs. IITU.L
Often compared with ISDE.L:
ISDE.L vs. VFEG.LISDE.L vs. JRDM.LISDE.L vs. VDEM.LISDE.L vs. LEML.LISDE.L vs. PRAM.LISDE.L vs. EDG2.LISDE.L vs. EMVL.L

Return for Risk

ISDW.L vs. ISDE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ISDW.L
ISDW.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ISDW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISDW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISDW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ISDW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISDW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
ISDE.L
ISDE.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
ISDE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISDE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISDE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ISDE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISDE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISDW.L vs. ISDE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS (ISDW.L) and iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISDE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ISDW.LISDE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.82
4.28

-1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.94
4.93

-0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.73

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.29

7.48

-2.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.43

28.54

-10.11

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ISDW.L vs. ISDE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISDW.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is lower than the ISDE.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISDW.L and ISDE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ISDW.LISDE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82

4.28

-1.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.67

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.66

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.23

+0.22

Drawdowns

ISDW.L vs. ISDE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISDW.L drawdown since its inception was -44.87%, smaller than the maximum ISDE.L drawdown of -59.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISDW.L and ISDE.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ISDW.LISDE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.87%

-59.96%

+15.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.91%

-14.25%

+7.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.20%

-21.81%

+3.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.76%

-32.28%

+9.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.77%

-36.67%

+2.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-3.68%

+3.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.26%

-21.89%

+16.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

3.74%

-1.75%

Volatility

ISDW.L vs. ISDE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS (ISDW.L) is 4.54%, while iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISDE.L) has a volatility of 12.14%. This indicates that ISDW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISDE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ISDW.LISDE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

12.14%

-7.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.20%

22.26%

-12.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.98%

24.94%

-11.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.72%

19.26%

-3.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.67%

19.87%

-4.20%

ISDW.L vs. ISDE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISDW.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ISDE.L's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

ISDW.L vs. ISDE.L - Dividend Comparison

ISDW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than ISDE.L's 1.08% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISDE.L
iShares MSCI EM Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		1.08%1.86%2.51%2.77%2.10%1.79%0.98%1.55%1.64%1.02%1.07%2.32%
ISDW.L
iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS		0.95%1.11%1.38%1.56%2.02%1.47%1.38%1.80%1.87%1.54%1.70%1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

ISDW.L and ISDE.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ISDW.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ISDW.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for ISDE.L.

ISDW.L is categorized as Global Equities, while ISDE.L is Emerging Markets Equities. ISDW.L tracks MSCI World Islamic Index, while ISDE.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Islamic Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ISDW.L and 0.85% for ISDE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISDW.L and ISDE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer