PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISDW.L vs. ISWD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISDW.L vs. ISWD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS (ISDW.L) and iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISWD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ISDW.L is traded in USD, while ISWD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ISWD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ISDW.L having a 19.78% return and ISWD.L slightly higher at 20.09%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ISDW.L having a 11.38% annualized return and ISWD.L not far ahead at 11.90%.


ISDW.L

1D
0.34%
1M
9.52%
YTD
19.78%
6M
21.32%
1Y
37.37%
3Y*
18.62%
5Y*
12.07%
10Y*
11.38%

ISWD.L

1D
0.38%
1M
10.08%
YTD
20.09%
6M
21.36%
1Y
37.91%
3Y*
19.11%
5Y*
12.54%
10Y*
11.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISDW.L vs. ISWD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISDW.L
iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS
19.78%19.35%5.72%23.61%-11.80%21.40%8.33%21.16%-9.55%19.36%
ISWD.L
iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
20.09%20.00%6.05%23.43%-11.47%22.58%8.33%22.72%-9.25%19.62%

Correlation

The correlation between ISDW.L and ISWD.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2008

0.81

The correlation between ISDW.L and ISWD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.94 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ISDW.L vs. ISWD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISDW.L
ISWD.L

Technology

43.8%
42.8%

Industrials

12.7%
12.9%

Energy

10.9%
11.6%

Healthcare

10.2%
10.4%

Basic Materials

9.6%
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
6.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
3.7%

Utilities

1.0%
1.1%

Communication Services

0.4%
0.4%

Real Estate

0.2%
0.2%

Financial Services

0.0%
0.0%

Technology

ISDW.L
43.8%
ISWD.L
42.8%

Industrials

ISDW.L
12.7%
ISWD.L
12.9%

Energy

ISDW.L
10.9%
ISWD.L
11.6%

Healthcare

ISDW.L
10.2%
ISWD.L
10.4%

Basic Materials

ISDW.L
9.6%
ISWD.L
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ISDW.L
7.1%
ISWD.L
6.9%

Consumer Defensive

ISDW.L
3.7%
ISWD.L
3.7%

Utilities

ISDW.L
1.0%
ISWD.L
1.1%

Communication Services

ISDW.L
0.4%
ISWD.L
0.4%

Real Estate

ISDW.L
0.2%
ISWD.L
0.2%

Financial Services

ISDW.L
0.0%
ISWD.L
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISDW.L vs. ISWD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISDW.L
ISDW.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ISDW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISDW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISDW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ISDW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISDW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

ISWD.L
ISWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ISWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ISWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISDW.L vs. ISWD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS (ISDW.L) and iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISWD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISDW.LISWD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.52

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.38

5.17

+0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.76

18.71

+0.05

ISDW.L vs. ISWD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISDW.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is comparable to the ISWD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISDW.L and ISWD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISDW.LISWD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.87

2.99

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.81

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.76

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.52

-0.06

Drawdowns

ISDW.L vs. ISWD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISDW.L drawdown since its inception was -44.87%, smaller than the maximum ISWD.L drawdown of -48.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISDW.L and ISWD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISDW.LISWD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.87%

-48.12%

+3.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.91%

-7.30%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.20%

-18.46%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.76%

-22.70%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.77%

-33.38%

-0.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.26%

-4.70%

-0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

2.02%

-0.03%

Volatility

ISDW.L vs. ISWD.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS (ISDW.L) has a higher volatility of 4.51% compared to iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISWD.L) at 3.95%. This indicates that ISDW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISWD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISDW.LISWD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.51%

3.95%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.20%

9.67%

+0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.99%

12.63%

+0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.73%

15.46%

+0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.67%

15.67%

0.00%

ISDW.L vs. ISWD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISDW.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ISWD.L's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISDW.L vs. ISWD.L - Dividend Comparison

ISDW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than ISWD.L's 1.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISDW.L
iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS
0.94%1.11%1.38%1.56%2.02%1.47%1.38%1.80%1.87%1.54%1.70%1.77%
ISWD.L
iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.27%1.50%1.74%1.99%2.43%1.98%1.88%2.37%2.39%2.09%2.09%2.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, ISDW.L and ISWD.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ISDW.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ISDW.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ISWD.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World Islamic Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ISDW.L and 0.60% for ISWD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISDW.L and ISWD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer