PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISCV vs. FYT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISCV vs. FYT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF (ISCV) and First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FYT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISCV achieves a 10.08% return, which is significantly lower than FYT's 15.42% return. Over the past 10 years, ISCV has underperformed FYT with an annualized return of 8.58%, while FYT has yielded a comparatively higher 9.99% annualized return.


ISCV

1D
-0.57%
1M
2.04%
YTD
10.08%
6M
10.27%
1Y
27.98%
3Y*
15.48%
5Y*
6.54%
10Y*
8.58%

FYT

1D
-1.70%
1M
-1.10%
YTD
15.42%
6M
14.14%
1Y
34.20%
3Y*
15.03%
5Y*
5.74%
10Y*
9.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISCV vs. FYT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISCV
iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF
10.08%10.38%9.31%16.55%-10.58%29.15%0.86%19.51%-17.39%8.59%
FYT
First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
15.42%4.00%3.24%22.90%-14.05%29.33%9.82%25.80%-14.73%7.14%

Correlation

The correlation between ISCV and FYT is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2011

0.90

The correlation between ISCV and FYT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

ISCV vs. FYT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISCV
FYT

Financial Services

21.1%
25.5%

Consumer Cyclical

13.4%
13.3%

Industrials

12.1%
12.9%

Healthcare

11.1%
6.1%

Real Estate

11.0%
9.1%

Technology

8.9%
8.4%

Energy

7.2%
7.2%

Basic Materials

5.8%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
7.2%

Utilities

3.6%
2.7%

Communication Services

1.8%
2.7%

Financial Services

ISCV
21.1%
FYT
25.5%

Consumer Cyclical

ISCV
13.4%
FYT
13.3%

Industrials

ISCV
12.1%
FYT
12.9%

Healthcare

ISCV
11.1%
FYT
6.1%

Real Estate

ISCV
11.0%
FYT
9.1%

Technology

ISCV
8.9%
FYT
8.4%

Energy

ISCV
7.2%
FYT
7.2%

Basic Materials

ISCV
5.8%
FYT
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

ISCV
3.7%
FYT
7.2%

Utilities

ISCV
3.6%
FYT
2.7%

Communication Services

ISCV
1.8%
FYT
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISCV vs. FYT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISCV
ISCV Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ISCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCV Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCV Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

FYT
FYT Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FYT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYT Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FYT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYT Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISCV vs. FYT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF (ISCV) and First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FYT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISCVFYTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.32

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

4.12

-1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.55

11.64

-1.09

ISCV vs. FYT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISCV Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the FYT Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISCV and FYT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISCVFYTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

1.83

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.26

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.39

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.39

-0.03

Drawdowns

ISCV vs. FYT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISCV drawdown since its inception was -63.14%, which is greater than FYT's maximum drawdown of -50.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCV and FYT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISCVFYTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.14%

-50.48%

-12.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.25%

-8.34%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.35%

-28.90%

+3.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.35%

-28.90%

+3.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.56%

-50.48%

-1.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-2.65%

+1.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.14%

-8.54%

-0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

2.95%

-0.29%

Volatility

ISCV vs. FYT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF (ISCV) is 3.80%, while First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FYT) has a volatility of 4.66%. This indicates that ISCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FYT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISCVFYTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.80%

4.66%

-0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.45%

11.62%

-1.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.28%

18.90%

-2.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.83%

22.56%

-1.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.30%

25.96%

-2.66%

ISCV vs. FYT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISCV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than FYT's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISCV vs. FYT - Dividend Comparison

ISCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than FYT's 1.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FYT
First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
1.12%0.94%2.07%1.50%1.36%1.19%0.96%1.44%1.78%1.16%1.16%0.96%
ISCV
iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF
1.88%2.04%2.01%2.21%2.12%1.95%2.01%2.36%2.48%1.74%2.49%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, ISCV and FYT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FYT has higher volatility (4.66%) compared to ISCV (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISCV dropped -63.14% vs FYT's -50.48%.

On 10-year performance, FYT leads with 9.99% vs 8.58% for ISCV. On fees, ISCV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, ISCV has been the lower-risk option at 3.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FYT has performed better with a 9.99% return vs 8.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISCV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for FYT.

ISCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 1.12% for FYT.

ISCV tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Value Extended Index, while FYT tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for ISCV and 0.72% for FYT.

FYT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISCV and FYT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer