ISCV vs. FYT
ISCV (iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF) and FYT (First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds - ISCV tracks the Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Value Extended Index while FYT tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ISCV returned 8.58%/yr vs 9.99%/yr for FYT. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ISCV charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for FYT.
Performance
ISCV vs. FYT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISCV achieves a 10.08% return, which is significantly lower than FYT's 15.42% return. Over the past 10 years, ISCV has underperformed FYT with an annualized return of 8.58%, while FYT has yielded a comparatively higher 9.99% annualized return.
ISCV
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 2.04%
- YTD
- 10.08%
- 6M
- 10.27%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 15.48%
- 5Y*
- 6.54%
- 10Y*
- 8.58%
FYT
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- -1.10%
- YTD
- 15.42%
- 6M
- 14.14%
- 1Y
- 34.20%
- 3Y*
- 15.03%
- 5Y*
- 5.74%
- 10Y*
- 9.99%
ISCV vs. FYT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISCV iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF | 10.08% | 10.38% | 9.31% | 16.55% | -10.58% | 29.15% | 0.86% | 19.51% | -17.39% | 8.59% |
FYT First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 15.42% | 4.00% | 3.24% | 22.90% | -14.05% | 29.33% | 9.82% | 25.80% | -14.73% | 7.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISCV and FYT is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2011 | 0.90 |
The correlation between ISCV and FYT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
ISCV vs. FYT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ISCV
FYT
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Real Estate
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Financial Services
ISCV
FYT
Consumer Cyclical
ISCV
FYT
Industrials
ISCV
FYT
Healthcare
ISCV
FYT
Real Estate
ISCV
FYT
Technology
ISCV
FYT
Energy
ISCV
FYT
Basic Materials
ISCV
FYT
Consumer Defensive
ISCV
FYT
Utilities
ISCV
FYT
Communication Services
ISCV
FYT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISCV vs. FYT — Risk / Return Rank
ISCV
FYT
ISCV vs. FYT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF (ISCV) and First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FYT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISCV | FYT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.32 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | 4.12 | -1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.55 | 11.64 | -1.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISCV | FYT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.73 | 1.83 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.26 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.39 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.39 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
ISCV vs. FYT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISCV drawdown since its inception was -63.14%, which is greater than FYT's maximum drawdown of -50.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCV and FYT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISCV | FYT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.14% | -50.48% | -12.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.25% | -8.34% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.35% | -28.90% | +3.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.35% | -28.90% | +3.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.56% | -50.48% | -1.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.68% | -2.65% | +1.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.14% | -8.54% | -0.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.66% | 2.95% | -0.29% |
Volatility
ISCV vs. FYT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF (ISCV) is 3.80%, while First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FYT) has a volatility of 4.66%. This indicates that ISCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FYT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISCV | FYT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.80% | 4.66% | -0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.45% | 11.62% | -1.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.28% | 18.90% | -2.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.83% | 22.56% | -1.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.30% | 25.96% | -2.66% |
ISCV vs. FYT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISCV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than FYT's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISCV vs. FYT - Dividend Comparison
ISCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than FYT's 1.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYT First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 1.12% | 0.94% | 2.07% | 1.50% | 1.36% | 1.19% | 0.96% | 1.44% | 1.78% | 1.16% | 1.16% | 0.96% |
ISCV iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF | 1.88% | 2.04% | 2.01% | 2.21% | 2.12% | 1.95% | 2.01% | 2.36% | 2.48% | 1.74% | 2.49% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, ISCV and FYT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FYT has higher volatility (4.66%) compared to ISCV (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISCV dropped -63.14% vs FYT's -50.48%.
On 10-year performance, FYT leads with 9.99% vs 8.58% for ISCV. On fees, ISCV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, ISCV has been the lower-risk option at 3.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FYT has performed better with a 9.99% return vs 8.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISCV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for FYT.
ISCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 1.12% for FYT.
ISCV tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Value Extended Index, while FYT tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for ISCV and 0.72% for FYT.
FYT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISCV and FYT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer