PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISCMF vs. USOI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISCMF vs. USOI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) and Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN (USOI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISCMF achieves a 22.87% return, which is significantly lower than USOI's 50.53% return.


ISCMF

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.67%
YTD
22.87%
6M
27.76%
1Y
37.85%
3Y*
15.20%
5Y*
10Y*

USOI

1D
1.94%
1M
2.54%
YTD
50.53%
6M
48.65%
1Y
49.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISCMF vs. USOI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ISCMF and USOI is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2024

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISCMF vs. USOI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISCMF
ISCMF Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ISCMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCMF Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCMF Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

USOI
USOI Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
USOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
USOI Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
USOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
USOI Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISCMF vs. USOI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) and Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN (USOI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISCMFUSOIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.53

1.37

+1.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.69

4.20

+2.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.68

9.74

+5.94

ISCMF vs. USOI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISCMF Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the USOI Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISCMF and USOI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISCMFUSOIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

2.23

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.94

-0.49

Drawdowns

ISCMF vs. USOI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISCMF drawdown since its inception was -25.42%, which is greater than USOI's maximum drawdown of -19.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCMF and USOI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISCMFUSOIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.42%

-19.49%

-5.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.69%

-11.90%

+6.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.26%

-3.08%

-2.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.43%

-7.21%

-6.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

5.12%

-2.70%

Volatility

ISCMF vs. USOI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) is 7.14%, while Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN (USOI) has a volatility of 10.14%. This indicates that ISCMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USOI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISCMFUSOIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.14%

10.14%

-3.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.90%

18.25%

-2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.53%

22.35%

-3.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.38%

22.59%

-8.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.38%

22.59%

-8.21%

ISCMF vs. USOI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISCMF has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than USOI's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISCMF vs. USOI - Dividend Comparison

ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USOI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 36.88%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ISCMF and USOI have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USOI has higher volatility (10.14%) compared to ISCMF (7.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISCMF dropped -25.42% vs USOI's -19.49%.

On 1-year performance, USOI leads with 49.69% vs 37.85% for ISCMF. On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ISCMF has been the lower-risk option at 7.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, USOI has performed better with a 49.69% return vs 37.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for USOI.

USOI has the higher dividend yield at 36.88%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.

ISCMF tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index, while USOI tracks Credit Suisse NASDAQ WTI Crude Oil FLOWS 106 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Credit Suisse. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ISCMF and 0.85% for USOI.

USOI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISCMF and USOI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer