PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISCGX vs. IMOAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISCGX vs. IMOAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Transamerica Small Cap Growth (ISCGX) and Transamerica Asset Allocation Moderate Portfolio Fund (IMOAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISCGX achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly higher than IMOAX's 5.63% return. Over the past 10 years, ISCGX has outperformed IMOAX with an annualized return of 8.81%, while IMOAX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.86% annualized return.


ISCGX

1D
1.27%
1M
6.48%
YTD
10.04%
6M
6.99%
1Y
12.82%
3Y*
7.10%
5Y*
0.87%
10Y*
8.81%

IMOAX

1D
0.15%
1M
3.06%
YTD
5.63%
6M
6.11%
1Y
16.27%
3Y*
12.46%
5Y*
5.33%
10Y*
6.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISCGX vs. IMOAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISCGX
Transamerica Small Cap Growth
10.04%-3.41%6.12%20.01%-30.85%18.23%32.20%29.47%-7.71%15.56%
IMOAX
Transamerica Asset Allocation Moderate Portfolio Fund
5.63%14.86%9.81%12.66%-16.03%7.92%14.66%14.68%-6.22%12.45%

Correlation

The correlation between ISCGX and IMOAX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.80

The correlation between ISCGX and IMOAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISCGX vs. IMOAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISCGX
ISCGX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
ISCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

IMOAX
IMOAX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
IMOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
IMOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISCGX vs. IMOAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Small Cap Growth (ISCGX) and Transamerica Asset Allocation Moderate Portfolio Fund (IMOAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISCGXIMOAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.41

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

2.69

-1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.43

11.98

-8.54

ISCGX vs. IMOAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISCGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the IMOAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISCGX and IMOAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISCGXIMOAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

2.16

-1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.58

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.77

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.61

-0.16

Drawdowns

ISCGX vs. IMOAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISCGX drawdown since its inception was -39.22%, roughly equal to the maximum IMOAX drawdown of -37.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCGX and IMOAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISCGXIMOAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.22%

-37.71%

-1.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.78%

-6.18%

-8.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.12%

-9.37%

-16.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.22%

-22.51%

-16.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.22%

-22.51%

-16.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.85%

0.00%

-13.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.21%

-4.91%

-6.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.28%

1.39%

+2.89%

Volatility

ISCGX vs. IMOAX - Volatility Comparison

Transamerica Small Cap Growth (ISCGX) has a higher volatility of 6.02% compared to Transamerica Asset Allocation Moderate Portfolio Fund (IMOAX) at 2.37%. This indicates that ISCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMOAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISCGXIMOAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.02%

2.37%

+3.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.46%

6.20%

+8.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.72%

7.70%

+11.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.35%

9.18%

+14.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.99%

8.96%

+14.03%

ISCGX vs. IMOAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISCGX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than IMOAX's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISCGX vs. IMOAX - Dividend Comparison

ISCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.06%, more than IMOAX's 5.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMOAX
Transamerica Asset Allocation Moderate Portfolio Fund
5.97%6.31%4.98%3.65%1.55%8.17%4.08%5.74%10.16%7.86%5.53%6.74%
ISCGX
Transamerica Small Cap Growth
14.06%15.47%12.92%4.61%4.29%11.50%8.30%6.94%11.71%10.40%121.18%9.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISCGX and IMOAX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ISCGX has higher volatility (6.02%) compared to IMOAX (2.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISCGX dropped -39.22% vs IMOAX's -37.71%.

IMOAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISCGX and IMOAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer