PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISCGX vs. UMBHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISCGX vs. UMBHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Transamerica Small Cap Growth (ISCGX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ISCGX

1D
1.27%
1M
6.48%
YTD
10.04%
6M
6.99%
1Y
12.82%
3Y*
7.10%
5Y*
0.87%
10Y*
8.81%

UMBHX

1D
2.34%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISCGX vs. UMBHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ISCGX and UMBHX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISCGX vs. UMBHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISCGX
ISCGX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
ISCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

UMBHX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISCGX vs. UMBHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Small Cap Growth (ISCGX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISCGXUMBHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.43

ISCGX vs. UMBHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISCGXUMBHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

1.79

-1.34

Drawdowns

ISCGX vs. UMBHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISCGX drawdown since its inception was -39.22%, which is greater than UMBHX's maximum drawdown of -1.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCGX and UMBHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISCGXUMBHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.22%

-1.86%

-37.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.85%

0.00%

-13.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.21%

-0.84%

-10.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.28%

Volatility

ISCGX vs. UMBHX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISCGXUMBHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.72%

30.30%

-11.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.35%

30.30%

-6.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.99%

30.30%

-7.31%

ISCGX vs. UMBHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISCGX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than UMBHX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISCGX vs. UMBHX - Dividend Comparison

ISCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.06%, while UMBHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISCGX
Transamerica Small Cap Growth
14.06%15.47%12.92%4.61%4.29%11.50%8.30%6.94%11.71%10.40%121.18%9.14%
UMBHX
Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISCGX and UMBHX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISCGX and UMBHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer