ISCGX vs. CMCIX
ISCGX (Transamerica Small Cap Growth) and CMCIX (Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past year, ISCGX returned 12.82% vs -0.28% for CMCIX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ISCGX charges 1.06%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for CMCIX.
Performance
ISCGX vs. CMCIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISCGX achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly higher than CMCIX's 2.66% return.
ISCGX
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 6.48%
- YTD
- 10.04%
- 6M
- 6.99%
- 1Y
- 12.82%
- 3Y*
- 7.10%
- 5Y*
- 0.87%
- 10Y*
- 8.81%
CMCIX
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 2.66%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- -0.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISCGX vs. CMCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ISCGX Transamerica Small Cap Growth | 10.04% | -3.41% | 6.12% | 7.35% |
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I | 2.66% | -5.28% | 10.46% | 7.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISCGX and CMCIX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2023 | 0.86 |
The correlation between ISCGX and CMCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISCGX vs. CMCIX — Risk / Return Rank
ISCGX
CMCIX
ISCGX vs. CMCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Small Cap Growth (ISCGX) and Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISCGX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.02 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 0.09 | +0.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.43 | 0.20 | +3.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISCGX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 0.07 | +0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.34 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
ISCGX vs. CMCIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISCGX drawdown since its inception was -39.22%, which is greater than CMCIX's maximum drawdown of -21.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCGX and CMCIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISCGX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.22% | -21.50% | -17.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.78% | -11.68% | -3.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.85% | -9.96% | -3.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.21% | -6.45% | -4.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.28% | 4.99% | -0.71% |
Volatility
ISCGX vs. CMCIX - Volatility Comparison
Transamerica Small Cap Growth (ISCGX) has a higher volatility of 6.02% compared to Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX) at 3.90%. This indicates that ISCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISCGX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.02% | 3.90% | +2.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.46% | 10.59% | +3.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.72% | 15.15% | +3.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.35% | 16.54% | +6.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.99% | 16.54% | +6.45% |
ISCGX vs. CMCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISCGX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is lower than CMCIX's 1.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISCGX vs. CMCIX - Dividend Comparison
ISCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.06%, more than CMCIX's 4.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I | 4.14% | 4.25% | 7.13% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ISCGX Transamerica Small Cap Growth | 14.06% | 15.47% | 12.92% | 4.61% | 4.29% | 11.50% | 8.30% | 6.94% | 11.71% | 10.40% | 121.18% | 9.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISCGX and CMCIX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ISCGX has higher volatility (6.02%) compared to CMCIX (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISCGX dropped -39.22% vs CMCIX's -21.50%.
ISCGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISCGX and CMCIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer