PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISAG.L vs. GIGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISAG.L vs. GIGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Agribusiness UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAG.L) and VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (GIGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ISAG.L is traded in USD, while GIGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GIGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISAG.L achieves a 12.83% return, which is significantly higher than GIGB.L's -2.63% return.


ISAG.L

1D
0.55%
1M
2.83%
6M
6.21%
YTD
12.83%
1Y
16.69%
3Y*
5.11%
5Y*
4.76%
10Y*
7.36%

GIGB.L

1D
-1.63%
1M
-17.04%
6M
-13.21%
YTD
-2.63%
1Y
48.52%
3Y*
20.10%
5Y*
12.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISAG.L vs. GIGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ISAG.L
iShares Agribusiness UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
12.83%16.78%-5.66%-8.90%2.73%23.33%10.28%17.65%-10.32%
GIGB.L
VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-2.63%91.15%-8.91%3.83%3.48%7.65%30.90%26.21%-40.20%

Correlation

The correlation between ISAG.L and GIGB.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2018

0.53

The correlation between ISAG.L and GIGB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISAG.L vs. GIGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISAG.L
ISAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
ISAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
ISAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

GIGB.L
GIGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
GIGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
GIGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISAG.L vs. GIGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Agribusiness UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAG.L) and VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (GIGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ISAG.LGIGB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.23

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

1.79

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.59

4.64

-0.05

ISAG.L vs. GIGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISAG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the GIGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISAG.L and GIGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ISAG.L vs. GIGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISAG.L drawdown since its inception was -37.16%, smaller than the maximum GIGB.L drawdown of -54.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISAG.L and GIGB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISAG.LGIGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.16%

-54.01%

+16.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.17%

-27.03%

+16.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.13%

-27.03%

+7.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.22%

-37.88%

+4.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.32%

-26.50%

+20.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.38%

-18.63%

+8.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.63%

10.43%

-6.80%

Volatility

ISAG.L vs. GIGB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Agribusiness UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAG.L) is 2.41%, while VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (GIGB.L) has a volatility of 10.26%. This indicates that ISAG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GIGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISAG.LGIGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.41%

10.26%

-7.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.29%

29.99%

-19.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.49%

35.88%

-22.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.62%

32.45%

-14.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.84%

31.66%

-13.82%

ISAG.L vs. GIGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISAG.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than GIGB.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISAG.L vs. GIGB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ISAG.L nor GIGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ISAG.L and GIGB.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GIGB.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GIGB.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ISAG.L.

ISAG.L is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while GIGB.L is Mining Equities. ISAG.L tracks S&P Commodity Producers Agribusiness Index NTR, while GIGB.L tracks S&P Global Mining Reduced Coal Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ISAG.L and 0.50% for GIGB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISAG.L and GIGB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer