GIGB.L vs. DAGB.L
GIGB.L (VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF) and DAGB.L (VanEck Digital Assets Equity UCITS ETF A USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - GIGB.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF, while DAGB.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GIGB.L returned 13.45%/yr vs -1.57%/yr for DAGB.L. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GIGB.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DAGB.L.
Performance
GIGB.L vs. DAGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIGB.L achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than DAGB.L's 9.15% return.
GIGB.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -13.91%
- 6M
- -11.20%
- YTD
- 0.48%
- 1Y
- 52.68%
- 3Y*
- 20.60%
- 5Y*
- 13.45%
- 10Y*
- —
DAGB.L
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -18.25%
- 6M
- -12.07%
- YTD
- 9.15%
- 1Y
- 2.69%
- 3Y*
- 23.46%
- 5Y*
- -1.57%
- 10Y*
- —
GIGB.L vs. DAGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIGB.L VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF | 0.48% | 77.74% | -7.37% | -1.37% | 15.87% | -4.17% |
DAGB.L VanEck Digital Assets Equity UCITS ETF A USD Acc | 9.15% | 2.70% | 31.12% | 326.16% | -85.21% | -24.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIGB.L and DAGB.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2021 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIGB.L vs. DAGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
GIGB.L
DAGB.L
GIGB.L vs. DAGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (GIGB.L) and VanEck Digital Assets Equity UCITS ETF A USD Acc (DAGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIGB.L | DAGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.06 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 0.06 | +1.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.30 | 0.10 | +5.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIGB.L vs. DAGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIGB.L drawdown since its inception was -45.07%, smaller than the maximum DAGB.L drawdown of -91.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIGB.L and DAGB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIGB.L | DAGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.07% | -91.23% | +46.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.52% | -45.63% | +19.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.52% | -58.48% | +31.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.29% | -91.23% | +61.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.02% | -43.87% | +19.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.82% | -57.10% | +42.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.76% | 26.74% | -16.98% |
Volatility
GIGB.L vs. DAGB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (GIGB.L) is 10.51%, while VanEck Digital Assets Equity UCITS ETF A USD Acc (DAGB.L) has a volatility of 12.76%. This indicates that GIGB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DAGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIGB.L | DAGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.51% | 12.76% | -2.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.35% | 39.88% | -11.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.84% | 59.66% | -25.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.68% | 71.92% | -42.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.36% | 71.36% | -42.00% |
GIGB.L vs. DAGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GIGB.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DAGB.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
GIGB.L vs. DAGB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither GIGB.L nor DAGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GIGB.L and DAGB.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GIGB.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GIGB.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DAGB.L.
GIGB.L is categorized as Global Equities, while DAGB.L is Technology Equities. GIGB.L tracks VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF, while DAGB.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GIGB.L and 0.65% for DAGB.L.
Find the right allocation for GIGB.L and DAGB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer