PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISAC.L vs. TSWE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISAC.L vs. TSWE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) and VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF A (TSWE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ISAC.L is traded in USD, while TSWE.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the TSWE.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ISAC.L having a 11.54% return and TSWE.DE slightly higher at 12.00%.


ISAC.L

1D
-0.10%
1M
4.26%
YTD
11.54%
6M
13.01%
1Y
28.81%
3Y*
21.19%
5Y*
11.38%
10Y*
12.63%

TSWE.DE

1D
0.11%
1M
5.87%
YTD
12.00%
6M
14.98%
1Y
27.95%
3Y*
20.31%
5Y*
10.62%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISAC.L vs. TSWE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ISAC.L
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
11.54%22.36%17.81%22.57%-18.16%18.85%15.66%25.77%-3.22%
TSWE.DE
VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF A
12.00%28.55%9.76%19.95%-17.85%19.08%15.29%25.72%-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between ISAC.L and TSWE.DE is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2018

0.89

The correlation between ISAC.L and TSWE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISAC.L vs. TSWE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISAC.L
ISAC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ISAC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

TSWE.DE
TSWE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
TSWE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSWE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSWE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
TSWE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSWE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISAC.L vs. TSWE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) and VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF A (TSWE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISAC.LTSWE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.35

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

2.70

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.72

10.58

+3.13

ISAC.L vs. TSWE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISAC.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the TSWE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISAC.L and TSWE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISAC.LTSWE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

1.95

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.67

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.77

-0.02

Drawdowns

ISAC.L vs. TSWE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISAC.L drawdown since its inception was -33.82%, roughly equal to the maximum TSWE.DE drawdown of -34.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISAC.L and TSWE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISAC.LTSWE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.82%

-34.35%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.77%

-10.32%

+1.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.56%

-15.85%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.07%

-28.20%

+2.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-0.26%

-0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.69%

-5.52%

+0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

2.63%

-0.53%

Volatility

ISAC.L vs. TSWE.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF A (TSWE.DE) at 3.57%. This indicates that ISAC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSWE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISAC.LTSWE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

3.57%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.77%

11.28%

-1.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.40%

14.30%

-1.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.57%

15.74%

-0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.95%

17.37%

-1.42%

ISAC.L vs. TSWE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ISAC.L and TSWE.DE have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ISAC.L vs. TSWE.DE - Dividend Comparison

ISAC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSWE.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
ISAC.L
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TSWE.DE
VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF A
1.83%1.94%2.19%2.22%2.37%1.63%1.87%2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISAC.L and TSWE.DE have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ISAC.L and TSWE.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

ISAC.L tracks MSCI ACWI Index, while TSWE.DE tracks Solactive Sustainable World Equity. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISAC.L and TSWE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer