PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISAC.L vs. NXTG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISAC.L vs. NXTG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) and First Trust Indxx NextG UCITS ETF (NXTG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ISAC.L is traded in USD, while NXTG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the NXTG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISAC.L achieves a 11.18% return, which is significantly lower than NXTG.L's 38.59% return. Over the past 10 years, ISAC.L has outperformed NXTG.L with an annualized return of 12.44%, while NXTG.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.11% annualized return.


ISAC.L

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.60%
6M
9.67%
YTD
11.18%
1Y
23.73%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
11.12%
10Y*
12.44%

NXTG.L

1D
-0.25%
1M
-5.49%
6M
35.96%
YTD
38.59%
1Y
56.79%
3Y*
17.63%
5Y*
9.05%
10Y*
7.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISAC.L vs. NXTG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISAC.L
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
11.18%22.36%17.81%22.57%-18.16%18.85%15.66%25.75%-9.73%24.40%
NXTG.L
First Trust Indxx NextG UCITS ETF
38.59%28.23%13.05%5.58%-32.47%14.83%7.36%12.68%-31.77%33.75%

Correlation

The correlation between ISAC.L and NXTG.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2015

0.62

The correlation between ISAC.L and NXTG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.78 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISAC.L vs. NXTG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISAC.L
ISAC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ISAC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

NXTG.L
NXTG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
NXTG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NXTG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
NXTG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
NXTG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NXTG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISAC.L vs. NXTG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) and First Trust Indxx NextG UCITS ETF (NXTG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ISAC.LNXTG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.46

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

2.29

+0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.76

4.79

+5.97

ISAC.L vs. NXTG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISAC.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the NXTG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISAC.L and NXTG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ISAC.L vs. NXTG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISAC.L drawdown since its inception was -33.82%, smaller than the maximum NXTG.L drawdown of -54.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISAC.L and NXTG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISAC.LNXTG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.82%

-54.89%

+21.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.77%

-24.85%

+16.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.56%

-32.80%

+16.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.07%

-45.46%

+19.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.82%

-54.89%

+21.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-10.07%

+9.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.62%

-26.87%

+22.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

11.89%

-9.69%

Volatility

ISAC.L vs. NXTG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) is 3.18%, while First Trust Indxx NextG UCITS ETF (NXTG.L) has a volatility of 6.74%. This indicates that ISAC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NXTG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISAC.LNXTG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

6.74%

-3.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.57%

16.85%

-6.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.88%

47.00%

-34.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.65%

44.57%

-28.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.82%

34.76%

-18.94%

Dividends

ISAC.L vs. NXTG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ISAC.L nor NXTG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ISAC.L and NXTG.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ISAC.L tracks MSCI All Country World Index (Net), while NXTG.L tracks First Trust Indxx NextG UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISAC.L and NXTG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer