ISAC.L vs. EYED.L
ISAC.L (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and EYED.L (iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - ISAC.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Index, while EYED.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ISAC.L returned 21.19%/yr vs 20.69%/yr for EYED.L. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ISAC.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EYED.L.
Performance
ISAC.L vs. EYED.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ISAC.L is traded in USD, while EYED.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the EYED.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISAC.L achieves a 11.54% return, which is significantly lower than EYED.L's 33.95% return.
ISAC.L
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- YTD
- 11.54%
- 6M
- 12.71%
- 1Y
- 28.36%
- 3Y*
- 21.19%
- 5Y*
- 11.38%
- 10Y*
- 12.63%
EYED.L
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- -3.58%
- YTD
- 33.95%
- 6M
- 31.30%
- 1Y
- 56.83%
- 3Y*
- 20.69%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISAC.L vs. EYED.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 11.54% | 22.36% | 17.81% | 22.57% | 7.62% |
EYED.L iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | 33.96% | 29.27% | -11.52% | 11.52% | 14.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISAC.L and EYED.L is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2022 | 0.27 |
The correlation between ISAC.L and EYED.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ISAC.L vs. EYED.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ISAC.L
EYED.L
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
ISAC.L
EYED.L
-
Financial Services
ISAC.L
EYED.L
-
Industrials
ISAC.L
EYED.L
-
Communication Services
ISAC.L
EYED.L
Consumer Cyclical
ISAC.L
EYED.L
-
Healthcare
ISAC.L
EYED.L
-
Consumer Defensive
ISAC.L
EYED.L
-
Energy
ISAC.L
EYED.L
Basic Materials
ISAC.L
EYED.L
-
Utilities
ISAC.L
EYED.L
-
Real Estate
ISAC.L
EYED.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISAC.L vs. EYED.L — Risk / Return Rank
ISAC.L
EYED.L
ISAC.L vs. EYED.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EYED.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISAC.L | EYED.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.42 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 5.56 | -2.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.72 | 18.16 | -4.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISAC.L | EYED.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | 2.54 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.92 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
ISAC.L vs. EYED.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISAC.L drawdown since its inception was -33.82%, which is greater than EYED.L's maximum drawdown of -23.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISAC.L and EYED.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISAC.L | EYED.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.82% | -23.12% | -10.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.77% | -10.17% | +1.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.56% | -23.12% | +6.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.72% | -6.09% | +5.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.69% | -5.51% | +0.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 3.12% | -1.02% |
Volatility
ISAC.L vs. EYED.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) is 3.84%, while iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EYED.L) has a volatility of 8.49%. This indicates that ISAC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EYED.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISAC.L | EYED.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.84% | 8.49% | -4.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.77% | 18.98% | -9.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.40% | 22.32% | -9.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.57% | 22.09% | -6.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.95% | 22.09% | -6.14% |
ISAC.L vs. EYED.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISAC.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than EYED.L's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ISAC.L vs. EYED.L - Dividend Comparison
ISAC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EYED.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EYED.L iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | 3.87% | 5.09% | 5.79% | 5.09% |
ISAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISAC.L and EYED.L have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EYED.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EYED.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ISAC.L.
ISAC.L is categorized as Global Equities, while EYED.L is Energy Equities. ISAC.L tracks MSCI ACWI Index, while EYED.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ISAC.L and 0.18% for EYED.L.
Find the right allocation for ISAC.L and EYED.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer