PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISAC.L vs. 5MVL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISAC.L vs. 5MVL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) and iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (5MVL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ISAC.L is traded in USD, while 5MVL.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 5MVL.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISAC.L achieves a 11.54% return, which is significantly lower than 5MVL.DE's 44.15% return.


ISAC.L

1D
-0.10%
1M
4.26%
YTD
11.54%
6M
13.01%
1Y
28.81%
3Y*
21.19%
5Y*
11.38%
10Y*
12.63%

5MVL.DE

1D
-2.36%
1M
10.51%
YTD
44.15%
6M
47.95%
1Y
86.04%
3Y*
37.65%
5Y*
16.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISAC.L vs. 5MVL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ISAC.L
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
11.54%22.36%17.81%22.57%-18.16%18.85%15.66%25.77%-2.66%
5MVL.DE
iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc)
44.15%43.66%14.08%18.20%-15.47%4.16%7.14%17.84%-1.43%

Correlation

The correlation between ISAC.L and 5MVL.DE is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2018

0.71

The correlation between ISAC.L and 5MVL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISAC.L vs. 5MVL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISAC.L
ISAC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ISAC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

5MVL.DE
5MVL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
5MVL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
5MVL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
5MVL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
5MVL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
5MVL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISAC.L vs. 5MVL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) and iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (5MVL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISAC.L5MVL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.71

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

7.50

-4.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.72

25.51

-11.79

ISAC.L vs. 5MVL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISAC.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is lower than the 5MVL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 4.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISAC.L and 5MVL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISAC.L5MVL.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

4.24

-1.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.86

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.80

-0.05

Drawdowns

ISAC.L vs. 5MVL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISAC.L drawdown since its inception was -33.82%, roughly equal to the maximum 5MVL.DE drawdown of -35.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISAC.L and 5MVL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISAC.L5MVL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.82%

-35.06%

+1.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.77%

-11.41%

+2.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.56%

-16.97%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.07%

-34.58%

+8.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-4.03%

+3.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.69%

-9.65%

+4.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

3.36%

-1.26%

Volatility

ISAC.L vs. 5MVL.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) is 3.84%, while iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (5MVL.DE) has a volatility of 9.05%. This indicates that ISAC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 5MVL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISAC.L5MVL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

9.05%

-5.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.77%

16.96%

-7.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.40%

20.21%

-7.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.57%

18.58%

-3.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.95%

20.13%

-4.18%

ISAC.L vs. 5MVL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISAC.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than 5MVL.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISAC.L vs. 5MVL.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ISAC.L nor 5MVL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ISAC.L and 5MVL.DE have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ISAC.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ISAC.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for 5MVL.DE.

ISAC.L is categorized as Global Equities, while 5MVL.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. ISAC.L tracks MSCI ACWI Index, while 5MVL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Select Value Factor Focus. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ISAC.L and 0.40% for 5MVL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISAC.L and 5MVL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer