IS3U.DE vs. AMED.DE
IS3U.DE (iShares MSCI France UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) are both Europe Equities funds - IS3U.DE tracks the MSCI France Index while AMED.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IS3U.DE returned 9.25%/yr vs 9.75%/yr for AMED.DE. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
IS3U.DE vs. AMED.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IS3U.DE achieves a 3.55% return, which is significantly lower than AMED.DE's 16.87% return. Over the past 10 years, IS3U.DE has underperformed AMED.DE with an annualized return of 9.25%, while AMED.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.75% annualized return.
IS3U.DE
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- YTD
- 3.55%
- 6M
- 4.27%
- 1Y
- 8.44%
- 3Y*
- 7.55%
- 5Y*
- 7.56%
- 10Y*
- 9.25%
AMED.DE
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 5.71%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 18.51%
- 1Y
- 26.18%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
IS3U.DE vs. AMED.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS3U.DE iShares MSCI France UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 3.55% | 14.48% | 0.41% | 17.60% | -6.82% | 28.35% | -4.13% | 31.67% | -9.06% | 14.42% |
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 16.87% | 20.15% | 5.95% | 16.68% | -10.71% | 20.90% | -1.35% | 27.22% | -12.98% | 11.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between IS3U.DE and AMED.DE is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2014 | 0.93 |
The correlation between IS3U.DE and AMED.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IS3U.DE vs. AMED.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IS3U.DE
AMED.DE
IS3U.DE vs. AMED.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI France UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IS3U.DE) and Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IS3U.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.33 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | 2.49 | -1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.37 | 9.40 | -7.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IS3U.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 | 1.74 | -1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.65 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.57 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.47 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
IS3U.DE vs. AMED.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IS3U.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, roughly equal to the maximum AMED.DE drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS3U.DE and AMED.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IS3U.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.98% | -38.35% | -0.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.86% | -10.56% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.91% | -14.07% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.82% | -24.06% | +3.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.98% | -38.35% | -0.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.54% | -0.17% | -2.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.84% | -6.69% | +0.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 2.81% | +0.65% |
Volatility
IS3U.DE vs. AMED.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI France UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IS3U.DE) is 4.25%, while Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) has a volatility of 5.61%. This indicates that IS3U.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMED.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IS3U.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.25% | 5.61% | -1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.24% | 12.64% | -1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.26% | 15.19% | -0.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.21% | 15.87% | +0.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.42% | 17.00% | +0.42% |
IS3U.DE vs. AMED.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IS3U.DE and AMED.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IS3U.DE vs. AMED.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IS3U.DE nor AMED.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IS3U.DE and AMED.DE have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IS3U.DE and AMED.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
IS3U.DE tracks MSCI France Index, while AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi.
Find the right allocation for IS3U.DE and AMED.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer