IS3N.DE vs. XM1D.DE
IS3N.DE (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)) and XM1D.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IS3N.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI), while XM1D.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IS3N.DE returned 19.99%/yr vs 15.70%/yr for XM1D.DE. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IS3N.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XM1D.DE.
Performance
IS3N.DE vs. XM1D.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IS3N.DE achieves a 25.82% return, which is significantly higher than XM1D.DE's 17.34% return.
IS3N.DE
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- 25.82%
- 6M
- 26.34%
- 1Y
- 45.77%
- 3Y*
- 19.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.00%
XM1D.DE
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 3.75%
- YTD
- 17.34%
- 6M
- 17.24%
- 1Y
- 32.28%
- 3Y*
- 15.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IS3N.DE vs. XM1D.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IS3N.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 25.82% | 17.14% | 13.87% | 7.21% |
XM1D.DE Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF | 17.34% | 12.60% | 13.72% | 13.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between IS3N.DE and XM1D.DE is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2023 | 0.51 |
The correlation between IS3N.DE and XM1D.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IS3N.DE vs. XM1D.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IS3N.DE
XM1D.DE
IS3N.DE vs. XM1D.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (XM1D.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IS3N.DE | XM1D.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.31 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.42 | 3.05 | +1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.00 | 9.87 | +6.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IS3N.DE | XM1D.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.69 | 1.64 | +1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 1.01 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
IS3N.DE vs. XM1D.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IS3N.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.06%, which is greater than XM1D.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS3N.DE and XM1D.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IS3N.DE | XM1D.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.06% | -16.92% | -18.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.52% | -10.15% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.17% | -16.92% | -2.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.49% | -0.34% | -2.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.30% | -3.04% | -6.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 3.14% | -0.23% |
Volatility
IS3N.DE vs. XM1D.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.16% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (XM1D.DE) at 3.78%. This indicates that IS3N.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XM1D.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IS3N.DE | XM1D.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.16% | 3.78% | +3.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.69% | 15.14% | -0.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.32% | 18.86% | -1.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.19% | 17.68% | -1.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 17.68% | +0.36% |
IS3N.DE vs. XM1D.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IS3N.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than XM1D.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IS3N.DE vs. XM1D.DE - Dividend Comparison
IS3N.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XM1D.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IS3N.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XM1D.DE Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF | 1.47% | 1.71% | 2.68% | 1.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IS3N.DE and XM1D.DE have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XM1D.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XM1D.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IS3N.DE.
IS3N.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while XM1D.DE is Japan Equities. IS3N.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI), while XM1D.DE tracks MSCI Japan. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IS3N.DE and 0.12% for XM1D.DE.
Find the right allocation for IS3N.DE and XM1D.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer