IS3N.DE vs. VJPB.L
IS3N.DE (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)) and VJPB.L (Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - IS3N.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI), while VJPB.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IS3N.DE returned 8.46%/yr vs 9.77%/yr for VJPB.L. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IS3N.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for VJPB.L.
Performance
IS3N.DE vs. VJPB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IS3N.DE is traded in EUR, while VJPB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VJPB.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IS3N.DE achieves a 24.88% return, which is significantly higher than VJPB.L's 16.52% return.
IS3N.DE
- 1D
- 3.12%
- 1M
- 1.48%
- YTD
- 24.88%
- 6M
- 27.74%
- 1Y
- 45.03%
- 3Y*
- 18.80%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- 10.23%
VJPB.L
- 1D
- 2.14%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- YTD
- 16.52%
- 6M
- 16.30%
- 1Y
- 31.57%
- 3Y*
- 14.07%
- 5Y*
- 9.77%
- 10Y*
- —
IS3N.DE vs. VJPB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS3N.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 24.88% | 17.14% | 13.88% | 7.20% | -13.85% | 7.09% | 7.07% | 8.86% |
VJPB.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating | 16.52% | 11.83% | 13.74% | 15.84% | -11.12% | 8.38% | 6.02% | -17.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between IS3N.DE and VJPB.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2019 | 0.51 |
The correlation between IS3N.DE and VJPB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IS3N.DE vs. VJPB.L — Risk / Return Rank
IS3N.DE
VJPB.L
IS3N.DE vs. VJPB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) and Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IS3N.DE | VJPB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.31 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.10 | 3.10 | +1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.25 | 10.24 | +4.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IS3N.DE vs. VJPB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IS3N.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.06%, smaller than the maximum VJPB.L drawdown of -39.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS3N.DE and VJPB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IS3N.DE | VJPB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.06% | -39.25% | +4.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.52% | -9.93% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.18% | -19.23% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.99% | -19.23% | -2.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.21% | -0.89% | -2.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.27% | -10.41% | +1.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 3.02% | +0.01% |
Volatility
IS3N.DE vs. VJPB.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.31% compared to Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L) at 4.36%. This indicates that IS3N.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VJPB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IS3N.DE | VJPB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.31% | 4.36% | +2.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.53% | 14.86% | +0.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.01% | 18.33% | -0.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.34% | 21.48% | -5.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.08% | 22.45% | -4.37% |
IS3N.DE vs. VJPB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IS3N.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VJPB.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IS3N.DE vs. VJPB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IS3N.DE nor VJPB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IS3N.DE and VJPB.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VJPB.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VJPB.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IS3N.DE.
IS3N.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while VJPB.L is Japan Equities. IS3N.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI), while VJPB.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IS3N.DE and 0.15% for VJPB.L.
Find the right allocation for IS3N.DE and VJPB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer