IS3N.DE vs. VA.TO
IS3N.DE (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)) and VA.TO (Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IS3N.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI), while VA.TO is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IS3N.DE returned 10.23%/yr vs 10.21%/yr for VA.TO. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IS3N.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for VA.TO.
Performance
IS3N.DE vs. VA.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IS3N.DE is traded in EUR, while VA.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the VA.TO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IS3N.DE achieves a 24.88% return, which is significantly lower than VA.TO's 28.50% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IS3N.DE having a 10.23% annualized return and VA.TO not far behind at 10.21%.
IS3N.DE
- 1D
- 3.12%
- 1M
- 1.48%
- YTD
- 24.88%
- 6M
- 27.74%
- 1Y
- 45.03%
- 3Y*
- 18.80%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- 10.23%
VA.TO
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- 28.50%
- 6M
- 30.01%
- 1Y
- 48.65%
- 3Y*
- 17.91%
- 5Y*
- 10.58%
- 10Y*
- 10.21%
IS3N.DE vs. VA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS3N.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 24.88% | 17.14% | 13.88% | 7.20% | -13.85% | 7.09% | 7.07% | 20.99% | -11.06% | 20.43% |
VA.TO Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF | 28.50% | 16.43% | 8.41% | 11.45% | -9.37% | 8.49% | 6.88% | 19.12% | -10.67% | 14.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between IS3N.DE and VA.TO is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2014 | 0.47 |
The correlation between IS3N.DE and VA.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (5 years) to 0.61 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IS3N.DE vs. VA.TO — Risk / Return Rank
IS3N.DE
VA.TO
IS3N.DE vs. VA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF (VA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IS3N.DE | VA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.44 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.10 | 4.57 | -0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.25 | 17.13 | -2.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IS3N.DE vs. VA.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IS3N.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.06%, which is greater than VA.TO's maximum drawdown of -30.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS3N.DE and VA.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IS3N.DE | VA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.06% | -30.26% | -4.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.52% | -10.60% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.18% | -16.65% | -2.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.99% | -17.17% | -4.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.51% | -30.26% | -2.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.21% | -2.86% | -0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.27% | -5.82% | -3.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 2.82% | +0.21% |
Volatility
IS3N.DE vs. VA.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) is 7.31%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF (VA.TO) has a volatility of 8.87%. This indicates that IS3N.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IS3N.DE | VA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.31% | 8.87% | -1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.53% | 17.34% | -1.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.01% | 20.16% | -2.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.34% | 16.52% | -0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.08% | 17.35% | +0.73% |
IS3N.DE vs. VA.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IS3N.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than VA.TO's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IS3N.DE vs. VA.TO - Dividend Comparison
IS3N.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS3N.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VA.TO Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF | 1.68% | 2.17% | 2.31% | 2.57% | 3.10% | 2.35% | 2.14% | 2.55% | 2.89% | 1.71% | 1.63% | 1.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IS3N.DE and VA.TO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IS3N.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IS3N.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VA.TO.
IS3N.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while VA.TO is Asia Pacific Equities. IS3N.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI), while VA.TO tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IS3N.DE and 0.22% for VA.TO.
Find the right allocation for IS3N.DE and VA.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer