PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IS3N.DE vs. EUNH.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IS3N.DE vs. EUNH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) and iShares Core Euro Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (EUNH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IS3N.DE achieves a 18.17% return, which is significantly higher than EUNH.DE's -1.68% return. Over the past 10 years, IS3N.DE has outperformed EUNH.DE with an annualized return of 8.50%, while EUNH.DE has yielded a comparatively lower -0.68% annualized return.


IS3N.DE

1D
-1.97%
1M
-9.63%
6M
10.94%
YTD
18.17%
1Y
31.10%
3Y*
17.61%
5Y*
7.21%
10Y*
8.50%

EUNH.DE

1D
0.05%
1M
-1.17%
6M
-0.68%
YTD
-1.68%
1Y
-1.04%
3Y*
1.61%
5Y*
-2.85%
10Y*
-0.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IS3N.DE vs. EUNH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IS3N.DE
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)
18.17%17.14%13.88%7.20%-13.85%7.09%7.07%20.99%-11.06%20.43%
EUNH.DE
iShares Core Euro Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
-1.68%0.80%1.52%6.83%-18.31%-3.38%4.72%6.76%0.86%-0.13%

Correlation

The correlation between IS3N.DE and EUNH.DE is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2014

0.04

Over the past year, IS3N.DE and EUNH.DE have become more correlated (0.37) than their long-term average of 0.04, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IS3N.DE vs. EUNH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IS3N.DE
IS3N.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
IS3N.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

EUNH.DE
EUNH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
EUNH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IS3N.DE vs. EUNH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) and iShares Core Euro Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (EUNH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IS3N.DEEUNH.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

0.96

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

-0.32

+3.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.76

-0.74

+9.50

IS3N.DE vs. EUNH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IS3N.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is higher than the EUNH.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IS3N.DE and EUNH.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IS3N.DE vs. EUNH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IS3N.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.06%, which is greater than EUNH.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS3N.DE and EUNH.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IS3N.DEEUNH.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.06%

-22.42%

-12.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.59%

-3.59%

-7.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.18%

-4.10%

-15.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.99%

-21.53%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.51%

-22.42%

-10.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.59%

-15.48%

+4.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.23%

-5.88%

-3.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

1.57%

+1.93%

Volatility

IS3N.DE vs. EUNH.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.01% compared to iShares Core Euro Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (EUNH.DE) at 1.12%. This indicates that IS3N.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IS3N.DEEUNH.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.01%

1.12%

+6.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.36%

3.74%

+13.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.68%

4.55%

+15.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.72%

6.37%

+10.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.19%

5.52%

+12.67%

IS3N.DE vs. EUNH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IS3N.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than EUNH.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IS3N.DE vs. EUNH.DE - Dividend Comparison

IS3N.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EUNH.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUNH.DE
iShares Core Euro Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
1.31%2.30%1.77%0.97%0.27%0.24%0.47%0.65%0.66%0.70%0.94%0.62%
IS3N.DE
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IS3N.DE and EUNH.DE have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EUNH.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EUNH.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IS3N.DE.

IS3N.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while EUNH.DE is European Government Bonds. IS3N.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (IMI), while EUNH.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Aggregate Treasury. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IS3N.DE and 0.07% for EUNH.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IS3N.DE and EUNH.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer