PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IS3N.DE vs. ESIF.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IS3N.DE vs. ESIF.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) and iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIF.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IS3N.DE achieves a 28.06% return, which is significantly higher than ESIF.DE's 7.54% return.


IS3N.DE

1D
2.55%
1M
6.99%
YTD
28.06%
6M
30.89%
1Y
48.73%
3Y*
19.82%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*
10.44%

ESIF.DE

1D
1.42%
1M
6.38%
YTD
7.54%
6M
11.44%
1Y
29.59%
3Y*
29.86%
5Y*
20.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IS3N.DE vs. ESIF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IS3N.DE
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)
28.06%17.14%13.88%7.20%-13.85%7.09%4.16%
ESIF.DE
iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
7.54%47.72%25.25%21.60%-2.85%29.01%2.38%

Correlation

The correlation between IS3N.DE and ESIF.DE is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2020

0.49

The correlation between IS3N.DE and ESIF.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IS3N.DE vs. ESIF.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IS3N.DE
IS3N.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
IS3N.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

ESIF.DE
ESIF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
ESIF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESIF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESIF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
ESIF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESIF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IS3N.DE vs. ESIF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) and iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IS3N.DEESIF.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.28

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.61

2.38

+2.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.02

8.11

+7.91

IS3N.DE vs. ESIF.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IS3N.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is higher than the ESIF.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IS3N.DE and ESIF.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IS3N.DE vs. ESIF.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IS3N.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.06%, which is greater than ESIF.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS3N.DE and ESIF.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IS3N.DEESIF.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.06%

-22.87%

-12.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.52%

-12.35%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.18%

-17.08%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.99%

-22.87%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

0.00%

-0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.26%

-4.12%

-5.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

3.62%

-0.59%

Volatility

IS3N.DE vs. ESIF.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.06% compared to iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIF.DE) at 5.58%. This indicates that IS3N.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESIF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IS3N.DEESIF.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.06%

5.58%

+1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.70%

14.93%

+0.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.12%

18.27%

-0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.38%

19.05%

-2.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.10%

18.88%

-0.78%

IS3N.DE vs. ESIF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IS3N.DE and ESIF.DE have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IS3N.DE vs. ESIF.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IS3N.DE nor ESIF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IS3N.DE and ESIF.DE have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IS3N.DE and ESIF.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.

IS3N.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while ESIF.DE is Financials Equities. IS3N.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI), while ESIF.DE tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IS3N.DE and ESIF.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer