PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IS3N.DE vs. DFEU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IS3N.DE vs. DFEU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) and iShares Europe Defence UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (DFEU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IS3N.DE is traded in EUR, while DFEU.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the DFEU.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IS3N.DE achieves a 24.88% return, which is significantly higher than DFEU.L's 4.78% return.


IS3N.DE

1D
3.12%
1M
1.48%
YTD
24.88%
6M
27.74%
1Y
45.03%
3Y*
18.80%
5Y*
8.46%
10Y*
10.23%

DFEU.L

1D
0.00%
1M
5.69%
YTD
4.78%
6M
6.37%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IS3N.DE vs. DFEU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IS3N.DE and DFEU.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2025

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IS3N.DE vs. DFEU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IS3N.DE
IS3N.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
IS3N.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

DFEU.L

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IS3N.DE vs. DFEU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) and iShares Europe Defence UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (DFEU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IS3N.DEDFEU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.25

IS3N.DE vs. DFEU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IS3N.DE vs. DFEU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IS3N.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.06%, which is greater than DFEU.L's maximum drawdown of -24.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS3N.DE and DFEU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IS3N.DEDFEU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.06%

-24.20%

-10.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.21%

-13.66%

+10.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.27%

-11.43%

+2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

Volatility

IS3N.DE vs. DFEU.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IS3N.DEDFEU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.01%

38.88%

-20.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.34%

38.88%

-22.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.08%

38.88%

-20.80%

IS3N.DE vs. DFEU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IS3N.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than DFEU.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

IS3N.DE vs. DFEU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IS3N.DE nor DFEU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IS3N.DE and DFEU.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IS3N.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IS3N.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for DFEU.L.

IS3N.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while DFEU.L is Aerospace & Defense. IS3N.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI), while DFEU.L tracks STOXX Europe Targeted Defence Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IS3N.DE and 0.35% for DFEU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IS3N.DE and DFEU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer