PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IS3N.DE vs. D5BL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IS3N.DE vs. D5BL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (D5BL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IS3N.DE achieves a 25.82% return, which is significantly higher than D5BL.DE's 13.85% return. Over the past 10 years, IS3N.DE has underperformed D5BL.DE with an annualized return of 10.00%, while D5BL.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.77% annualized return.


IS3N.DE

1D
-1.45%
1M
5.25%
YTD
25.82%
6M
27.45%
1Y
46.76%
3Y*
19.99%
5Y*
8.61%
10Y*
10.00%

D5BL.DE

1D
-0.38%
1M
4.90%
YTD
13.85%
6M
17.13%
1Y
33.04%
3Y*
21.76%
5Y*
14.60%
10Y*
10.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IS3N.DE vs. D5BL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IS3N.DE
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)
25.82%17.14%13.87%7.20%-14.09%7.38%7.07%21.01%-11.06%20.43%
D5BL.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF
13.85%35.78%10.37%14.14%-4.63%26.83%-8.58%22.90%-13.98%9.78%

Correlation

The correlation between IS3N.DE and D5BL.DE is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2014

0.65

The correlation between IS3N.DE and D5BL.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (3 years) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IS3N.DE vs. D5BL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IS3N.DE
IS3N.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IS3N.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

D5BL.DE
D5BL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
D5BL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
D5BL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
D5BL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
D5BL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
D5BL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IS3N.DE vs. D5BL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (D5BL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IS3N.DED5BL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.42

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.42

3.28

+1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.00

12.52

+3.49

IS3N.DE vs. D5BL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IS3N.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is comparable to the D5BL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IS3N.DE and D5BL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IS3N.DED5BL.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69

2.28

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.93

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.60

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.48

-0.04

Drawdowns

IS3N.DE vs. D5BL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IS3N.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.06%, smaller than the maximum D5BL.DE drawdown of -40.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS3N.DE and D5BL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IS3N.DED5BL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.06%

-40.40%

+5.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.52%

-10.02%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.17%

-17.36%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.01%

-19.58%

-2.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.51%

-40.40%

+7.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.49%

-1.22%

-1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.30%

-7.23%

-2.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

2.63%

+0.28%

Volatility

IS3N.DE vs. D5BL.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.16% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (D5BL.DE) at 4.83%. This indicates that IS3N.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than D5BL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IS3N.DED5BL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.16%

4.83%

+2.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.69%

11.54%

+3.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.32%

14.44%

+2.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.19%

15.59%

+0.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.04%

17.76%

+0.28%

IS3N.DE vs. D5BL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IS3N.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than D5BL.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IS3N.DE vs. D5BL.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IS3N.DE nor D5BL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IS3N.DE and D5BL.DE have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, D5BL.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

D5BL.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IS3N.DE.

IS3N.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while D5BL.DE is Europe Equities. IS3N.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI), while D5BL.DE tracks MSCI Europe Enhanced Value. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IS3N.DE and 0.15% for D5BL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IS3N.DE and D5BL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer