PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IS3N.DE vs. 4COP.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IS3N.DE vs. 4COP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) and Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (4COP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IS3N.DE achieves a 18.17% return, which is significantly higher than 4COP.DE's 3.65% return.


IS3N.DE

1D
-1.97%
1M
-9.63%
6M
10.94%
YTD
18.17%
1Y
31.10%
3Y*
17.61%
5Y*
7.21%
10Y*
8.50%

4COP.DE

1D
-3.07%
1M
-14.14%
6M
-7.51%
YTD
3.65%
1Y
73.88%
3Y*
24.85%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IS3N.DE vs. 4COP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IS3N.DE
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)
18.17%17.14%13.88%7.20%-13.85%-2.23%
4COP.DE
Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
3.65%73.65%9.36%4.93%6.75%1.24%

Correlation

The correlation between IS3N.DE and 4COP.DE is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2021

0.62

The correlation between IS3N.DE and 4COP.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IS3N.DE vs. 4COP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IS3N.DE
IS3N.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
IS3N.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

4COP.DE
4COP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
4COP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
4COP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
4COP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
4COP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
4COP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IS3N.DE vs. 4COP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) and Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (4COP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IS3N.DE4COP.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.28

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

2.83

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.76

7.53

+1.23

IS3N.DE vs. 4COP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IS3N.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the 4COP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IS3N.DE and 4COP.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IS3N.DE vs. 4COP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IS3N.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.06%, smaller than the maximum 4COP.DE drawdown of -39.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS3N.DE and 4COP.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IS3N.DE4COP.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.06%

-39.13%

+4.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.59%

-26.21%

+15.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.18%

-39.13%

+19.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.59%

-21.29%

+10.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.23%

-14.67%

+5.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

9.85%

-6.35%

Volatility

IS3N.DE vs. 4COP.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) is 8.01%, while Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (4COP.DE) has a volatility of 12.75%. This indicates that IS3N.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 4COP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IS3N.DE4COP.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.01%

12.75%

-4.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.36%

35.70%

-18.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.68%

42.04%

-22.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.72%

33.60%

-16.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.19%

33.60%

-15.41%

IS3N.DE vs. 4COP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IS3N.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than 4COP.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

IS3N.DE vs. 4COP.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IS3N.DE nor 4COP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IS3N.DE and 4COP.DE have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IS3N.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IS3N.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for 4COP.DE.

IS3N.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while 4COP.DE is Copper. IS3N.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (IMI), while 4COP.DE tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IS3N.DE and 0.55% for 4COP.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IS3N.DE and 4COP.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer