IS3G.DE vs. AMED.DE
IS3G.DE (iShares MSCI EMU Large Cap UCITS ETF) and AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) are both Europe Equities funds - IS3G.DE tracks the MSCI EMU Large Cap while AMED.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IS3G.DE returned 9.99%/yr vs 9.75%/yr for AMED.DE. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IS3G.DE charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AMED.DE.
Performance
IS3G.DE vs. AMED.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IS3G.DE achieves a 8.74% return, which is significantly lower than AMED.DE's 16.87% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IS3G.DE having a 9.99% annualized return and AMED.DE not far behind at 9.75%.
IS3G.DE
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 2.36%
- YTD
- 8.74%
- 6M
- 10.30%
- 1Y
- 17.41%
- 3Y*
- 15.08%
- 5Y*
- 10.43%
- 10Y*
- 9.99%
AMED.DE
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 5.71%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 18.51%
- 1Y
- 26.18%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
IS3G.DE vs. AMED.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS3G.DE iShares MSCI EMU Large Cap UCITS ETF | 8.74% | 22.66% | 8.54% | 20.59% | -11.41% | 23.35% | -2.21% | 29.80% | -12.63% | 11.55% |
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 16.87% | 20.15% | 5.95% | 16.68% | -10.71% | 20.90% | -1.35% | 27.22% | -12.98% | 11.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between IS3G.DE and AMED.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2013 | 0.95 |
The correlation between IS3G.DE and AMED.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IS3G.DE vs. AMED.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IS3G.DE
AMED.DE
IS3G.DE vs. AMED.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EMU Large Cap UCITS ETF (IS3G.DE) and Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IS3G.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.33 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 2.49 | -0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.99 | 9.40 | -3.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IS3G.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 1.74 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.65 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.47 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
IS3G.DE vs. AMED.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IS3G.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.66%, roughly equal to the maximum AMED.DE drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS3G.DE and AMED.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IS3G.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.66% | -38.35% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.55% | -10.56% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.83% | -14.07% | -1.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.14% | -24.06% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.66% | -38.35% | -0.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -0.17% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.22% | -6.69% | +0.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.94% | 2.81% | +0.13% |
Volatility
IS3G.DE vs. AMED.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EMU Large Cap UCITS ETF (IS3G.DE) is 4.90%, while Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) has a volatility of 5.61%. This indicates that IS3G.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMED.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IS3G.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.90% | 5.61% | -0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.46% | 12.64% | -0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.12% | 15.19% | -0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 15.87% | +0.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.41% | 17.00% | +0.41% |
IS3G.DE vs. AMED.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IS3G.DE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than AMED.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
IS3G.DE vs. AMED.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IS3G.DE nor AMED.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, IS3G.DE and AMED.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, AMED.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMED.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for IS3G.DE.
IS3G.DE tracks MSCI EMU Large Cap, while AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for IS3G.DE and 0.25% for AMED.DE.
Find the right allocation for IS3G.DE and AMED.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer