IS3B.DE vs. CEBL.DE
IS3B.DE (iShares Euro Corporate Bond Financials UCITS ETF) and CEBL.DE (iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IS3B.DE is a European Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Euro Aggregate Financial, while CEBL.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IS3B.DE returned 1.25%/yr vs 11.02%/yr for CEBL.DE. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.
Performance
IS3B.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IS3B.DE achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than CEBL.DE's 31.90% return. Over the past 10 years, IS3B.DE has underperformed CEBL.DE with an annualized return of 1.25%, while CEBL.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 11.02% annualized return.
IS3B.DE
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 0.39%
- 6M
- 0.28%
- 1Y
- 1.99%
- 3Y*
- 5.22%
- 5Y*
- 0.42%
- 10Y*
- 1.25%
CEBL.DE
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 7.90%
- YTD
- 31.90%
- 6M
- 34.52%
- 1Y
- 55.49%
- 3Y*
- 22.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- 11.02%
IS3B.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS3B.DE iShares Euro Corporate Bond Financials UCITS ETF | 0.39% | 3.53% | 5.28% | 7.82% | -13.13% | -0.74% | 2.27% | 6.10% | -1.69% | 2.97% |
CEBL.DE iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 31.90% | 19.13% | 18.60% | 3.15% | -15.54% | 2.03% | 15.18% | 22.17% | -12.65% | 25.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between IS3B.DE and CEBL.DE is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2013 | 0.18 |
The correlation between IS3B.DE and CEBL.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IS3B.DE vs. CEBL.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IS3B.DE
CEBL.DE
IS3B.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Euro Corporate Bond Financials UCITS ETF (IS3B.DE) and iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IS3B.DE | CEBL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.50 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.73 | 4.83 | -4.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.62 | 17.67 | -15.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IS3B.DE | CEBL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 | 2.81 | -2.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.48 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | 0.58 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.43 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
IS3B.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IS3B.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.06%, smaller than the maximum CEBL.DE drawdown of -35.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS3B.DE and CEBL.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IS3B.DE | CEBL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.06% | -35.09% | +18.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.71% | -11.43% | +8.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.71% | -20.53% | +17.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.06% | -29.00% | +11.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.06% | -33.12% | +16.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -2.85% | +2.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.97% | -11.09% | +8.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.76% | 3.13% | -2.37% |
Volatility
IS3B.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Euro Corporate Bond Financials UCITS ETF (IS3B.DE) is 1.03%, while iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) has a volatility of 8.24%. This indicates that IS3B.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEBL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IS3B.DE | CEBL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.03% | 8.24% | -7.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.16% | 16.36% | -13.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.44% | 19.68% | -16.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.18% | 18.48% | -14.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.35% | 18.94% | -14.59% |
IS3B.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IS3B.DE and CEBL.DE have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IS3B.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Dividend Comparison
IS3B.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, while CEBL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBL.DE iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IS3B.DE iShares Euro Corporate Bond Financials UCITS ETF | 3.19% | 3.08% | 2.95% | 2.42% | 1.00% | 0.75% | 0.97% | 1.09% | 1.10% | 1.12% | 1.52% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IS3B.DE and CEBL.DE have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IS3B.DE and CEBL.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.
IS3B.DE is categorized as European Corporate Bonds, while CEBL.DE is Asia Pacific Equities. IS3B.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Aggregate Financial, while CEBL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia.
Find the right allocation for IS3B.DE and CEBL.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer