PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IS15.L vs. XZE5.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IS15.L vs. XZE5.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares GBP Corporate Bond 0-5yr UCITS ETF (IS15.L) and Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C (XZE5.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IS15.L

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.56%
YTD
0.59%
6M
1.09%
1Y
4.39%
3Y*
6.08%
5Y*
2.33%
10Y*
2.28%

XZE5.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IS15.L vs. XZE5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IS15.L
iShares GBP Corporate Bond 0-5yr UCITS ETF
0.59%6.24%4.89%7.16%-6.09%-0.84%1.84%
XZE5.L
Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C
-0.42%8.64%-0.59%3.12%-1.52%-6.82%-0.17%

Correlation

The correlation between IS15.L and XZE5.L is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2020

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IS15.L vs. XZE5.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IS15.L
IS15.L Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
IS15.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS15.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS15.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
IS15.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS15.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

XZE5.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IS15.L vs. XZE5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares GBP Corporate Bond 0-5yr UCITS ETF (IS15.L) and Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C (XZE5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IS15.LXZE5.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.07

IS15.L vs. XZE5.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IS15.LXZE5.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

Drawdowns

IS15.L vs. XZE5.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IS15.LXZE5.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.50%

Volatility

IS15.L vs. XZE5.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IS15.LXZE5.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.13%

IS15.L vs. XZE5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IS15.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XZE5.L's 0.16% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IS15.L vs. XZE5.L - Dividend Comparison

IS15.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, while XZE5.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IS15.L
iShares GBP Corporate Bond 0-5yr UCITS ETF
4.54%4.35%4.06%3.05%1.80%1.72%1.81%2.03%2.08%2.15%2.55%2.91%
XZE5.L
Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IS15.L and XZE5.L have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XZE5.L is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XZE5.L is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IS15.L.

IS15.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts 1-5 TR, while XZE5.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IS15.L and 0.16% for XZE5.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IS15.L and XZE5.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer