IS0E.DE vs. EMIM.L
IS0E.DE (iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF) and EMIM.L (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IS0E.DE is a Precious Metals fund tracking the S&P Commodity Producers Gold, while EMIM.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IS0E.DE returned 13.92%/yr vs 10.04%/yr for EMIM.L. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IS0E.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EMIM.L.
Performance
IS0E.DE vs. EMIM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IS0E.DE is traded in EUR, while EMIM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EMIM.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IS0E.DE achieves a -0.06% return, which is significantly lower than EMIM.L's 25.35% return. Over the past 10 years, IS0E.DE has outperformed EMIM.L with an annualized return of 13.92%, while EMIM.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.04% annualized return.
IS0E.DE
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- -5.38%
- YTD
- -0.06%
- 6M
- 7.39%
- 1Y
- 60.26%
- 3Y*
- 38.14%
- 5Y*
- 19.77%
- 10Y*
- 13.92%
EMIM.L
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- 3.09%
- YTD
- 25.35%
- 6M
- 26.38%
- 1Y
- 45.96%
- 3Y*
- 19.97%
- 5Y*
- 8.62%
- 10Y*
- 10.04%
IS0E.DE vs. EMIM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS0E.DE iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF | -0.06% | 129.59% | 18.76% | 6.29% | -3.80% | -3.04% | 13.47% | 44.05% | -4.38% | -6.00% |
EMIM.L iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 25.35% | 16.91% | 14.45% | 7.15% | -14.80% | 7.30% | 8.67% | 19.86% | -10.44% | 19.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between IS0E.DE and EMIM.L is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2014 | 0.19 |
The correlation between IS0E.DE and EMIM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IS0E.DE vs. EMIM.L — Risk / Return Rank
IS0E.DE
EMIM.L
IS0E.DE vs. EMIM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF (IS0E.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IS0E.DE | EMIM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.49 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.17 | 4.38 | -2.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.45 | 15.91 | -10.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IS0E.DE | EMIM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 2.68 | -1.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.53 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.55 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.44 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
IS0E.DE vs. EMIM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IS0E.DE drawdown since its inception was -71.63%, which is greater than EMIM.L's maximum drawdown of -34.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS0E.DE and EMIM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IS0E.DE | EMIM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.63% | -34.80% | -36.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.26% | -10.65% | -16.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.26% | -17.95% | -9.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.03% | -22.35% | -15.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.62% | -32.44% | -13.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.93% | -2.54% | -20.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.74% | -9.31% | -24.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.85% | 2.94% | +7.91% |
Volatility
IS0E.DE vs. EMIM.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF (IS0E.DE) has a higher volatility of 12.84% compared to iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L) at 7.15%. This indicates that IS0E.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMIM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IS0E.DE | EMIM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.84% | 7.15% | +5.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.62% | 14.50% | +19.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.58% | 17.44% | +30.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.83% | 16.34% | +17.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.53% | 18.14% | +14.39% |
IS0E.DE vs. EMIM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IS0E.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than EMIM.L's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
IS0E.DE vs. EMIM.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IS0E.DE nor EMIM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IS0E.DE and EMIM.L have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EMIM.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMIM.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IS0E.DE.
IS0E.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while EMIM.L is Emerging Markets Equities. IS0E.DE tracks S&P Commodity Producers Gold, while EMIM.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IS0E.DE and 0.18% for EMIM.L.
Find the right allocation for IS0E.DE and EMIM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer