IRVH vs. YCS
IRVH (Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - IRVH is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund actively managed by Global X, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). IRVH is actively managed, while YCS is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IRVH returned 0.36%/yr vs 20.30%/yr for YCS. At a correlation of -0.33, they often move in opposite directions. IRVH charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
IRVH vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IRVH achieves a -4.22% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 10.29% return.
IRVH
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -0.62%
- 6M
- -3.96%
- YTD
- -4.22%
- 1Y
- -2.61%
- 3Y*
- 0.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YCS
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- 2.50%
- 6M
- 8.31%
- YTD
- 10.29%
- 1Y
- 29.06%
- 3Y*
- 20.30%
- 5Y*
- 24.01%
- 10Y*
- 13.13%
IRVH vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRVH Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | -4.22% | 7.71% | -5.49% | 0.83% | -6.69% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 10.29% | 9.04% | 35.41% | 28.70% | -6.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between IRVH and YCS is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2022 | -0.33 |
The correlation between IRVH and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.33 (all time) to -0.14 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IRVH vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
IRVH
YCS
IRVH vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IRVH) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IRVH | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.35 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.44 | 3.76 | -4.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.93 | 11.88 | -12.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IRVH vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IRVH drawdown since its inception was -14.98%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRVH and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IRVH | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.98% | -49.56% | +34.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.11% | -8.30% | +2.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.03% | -23.05% | +15.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.14% | -1.01% | -10.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.74% | -19.82% | +10.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 2.62% | +0.28% |
Volatility
IRVH vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IRVH) is 1.17%, while ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) has a volatility of 3.05%. This indicates that IRVH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IRVH | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.17% | 3.05% | -1.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.38% | 11.94% | -8.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.77% | 16.66% | -11.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.76% | 21.09% | -12.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.76% | 18.75% | -9.99% |
IRVH vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IRVH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
IRVH vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
IRVH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRVH Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | 5.65% | 4.89% | 3.34% | 3.69% | 2.73% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IRVH and YCS have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YCS has higher volatility (3.05%) compared to IRVH (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRVH dropped -14.98% vs YCS's -49.56%.
On 3-year performance, YCS leads with 20.30% vs 0.36% for IRVH. On fees, IRVH is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, IRVH has been the lower-risk option at 1.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, YCS has performed better with a 20.30% return vs 0.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IRVH is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
IRVH has the higher dividend yield at 5.65%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
IRVH is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: Global X and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IRVH and 1.00% for YCS.
YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IRVH and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer